If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Freedomain
Hi there, this is Stefan Molyneux - welcome to Freedomain, the Locals community! One of the last homes for real philosophy in the world!
Feel free to have a look around, chat with other members, share your thoughts, objections, arguments and memes!
This is a place where we strive to achieve the truth through consistent virtue - a great playground for innovative ideas and interactions!
Feel free to have a look around, chat with other members, share your thoughts, objections, arguments and memes!
This is a place where we strive to achieve the truth through consistent virtue - a great playground for innovative ideas and interactions!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Stefan Molyneux@freedomain
September 14, 2021
HOW TO DEAL WITH VERBAL ABUSE
FROM A LISTENER:
People get "upset" when you brag about your supposed achievements because your narcissism and self-aggrandizement is absolutely blaring in this instance. How you don't see it as such an apparently intelligent person is completely mystifying to me. You did this hour long call-in show about why people point out your obvious narcissism, which is, in itself, highly narcissistic. You speak about self-knowledge, but you clearly have no self-knowledge at all if you can't see your own narcissism.
Your fuzzy math about how many kids you've saved from being abused is just hilarious. Like even if you have saved some kids from being abused, your ridiculous fly-by-night equations to get the numbers you did is just absurd. Like just say "I've saved children from being abused". Even I would agree with that, but when you try to quantify it with these ridiculous n ...
umbers, it shows how self-glorifying you are.
Even in this call in show, you ignore one of your listeners when he brings up the valid argument that in the show, you set up an impossible standard: you said that you'll only listen to criticism from people who can be shown to have saved children. As if that has any bearing on the validity of someone's argument. This is just a really weird Ad Hominem fallacy. "I'm not gonna listen to you because you don't work for CPS!"
The vast majority of people, obviously, can't demonstrably show that they've saved children from harm like some kind of caped superhero. That's an absurd, impossible standard. It's a complete fallacy. What you're doing is setting yourself up as being above criticism, given this impossible standard - as the caller rightly points out (albeit in a very timid manner).
The irony here is just absolutely astounding.
Is this what's become of the great Stefan Molyneux? Whining for an hour because of what one of his paying subscribers wrote on his locals page? Maybe it's time to think about retiring, man.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
SHARE PEACEFUL PARENTING!
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
00:01:00
Life After Covid! Twitter/X Space
Saturday Night Live 16 August 2025
In this episode, we explore philosophical themes such as the nature of virtue, societal norms, and the impact of the sexual revolution on personal relationships. Through engaging caller discussions, I address the differing perceptions of virginity between genders and the role of personal integrity amid societal challenges. We critique modern media's portrayal of morality, particularly in Quentin Tarantino's films, while emphasizing the necessity of individual accountability and virtue. Each caller adds depth to the conversation, illustrating how philosophical principles actively shape our lives and communities.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual ...
02:16:11
Answers to 'X' Listener Questions 2
In this episode, I examine the intricate relationship between love, virtue, and moral distinctions, particularly in the context of parenthood. Addressing a question from a listener, I clarify how animal attachments differ from human moral love. Reflecting on my experiences as a father, I explore the joy of nurturing a child despite their lack of moral virtues.
The conversation shifts to individualism versus collectivism, advocating for merit-based assessments of character. I also discuss the moral obligations of parenting, trust issues, and the risks in relationships.
Additionally, I assert a duty to combat evil and pursue virtue, highlighting the constructive potential of emotions like jealousy when balanced. Ultimately, this episode encourages personal responsibility and introspection on our values, urging listeners to navigate the tensions between tradition and modernity while embracing individual agency in their lives.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK ...
00:42:00
Thanks for your patience today!
I will get to a donor live stream later this week, thank you so much for letting me talk to X today, since I know today was supposed to be donor only
Freedomain Premium Content!
In the vast tapestry of human experience, this collection of premium content stands as a beacon of reflection and introspection! Each episode is a journey into the complexities of our shared existence. From the intricate dance of self-forgiveness to the harrowing tales of personal adversity, these moments of life challenge, provoke, and inspire.
