If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
FROM A LISTENER:
People get "upset" when you brag about your supposed achievements because your narcissism and self-aggrandizement is absolutely blaring in this instance. How you don't see it as such an apparently intelligent person is completely mystifying to me. You did this hour long call-in show about why people point out your obvious narcissism, which is, in itself, highly narcissistic. You speak about self-knowledge, but you clearly have no self-knowledge at all if you can't see your own narcissism.
Your fuzzy math about how many kids you've saved from being abused is just hilarious. Like even if you have saved some kids from being abused, your ridiculous fly-by-night equations to get the numbers you did is just absurd. Like just say "I've saved children from being abused". Even I would agree with that, but when you try to quantify it with these ridiculous numbers, it shows how self-glorifying you are.
Even in this call in show, you ignore one of your listeners when he brings up the valid argument that in the show, you set up an impossible standard: you said that you'll only listen to criticism from people who can be shown to have saved children. As if that has any bearing on the validity of someone's argument. This is just a really weird Ad Hominem fallacy. "I'm not gonna listen to you because you don't work for CPS!"
The vast majority of people, obviously, can't demonstrably show that they've saved children from harm like some kind of caped superhero. That's an absurd, impossible standard. It's a complete fallacy. What you're doing is setting yourself up as being above criticism, given this impossible standard - as the caller rightly points out (albeit in a very timid manner).
The irony here is just absolutely astounding.
Is this what's become of the great Stefan Molyneux? Whining for an hour because of what one of his paying subscribers wrote on his locals page? Maybe it's time to think about retiring, man.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Stefan Molyneux digs into the challenges of romantic relationships, particularly how men and women interact. He pushes back against the idea that equality means being identical, pointing out that real differences shape what people can do and how they excel. Drawing from things like how siblings get along or gaps in pay, he stresses the need to appreciate what each person brings to the table. He also looks at how mismatched ways of talking can lead to confusion, and suggests embracing those differences instead of letting them cause friction. In the end, Molyneux calls for an approach to equality that respects personal traits as key to solid partnerships.
0:00:00 Relationships and Equality
0:02:37 The Illusion of Sameness
0:04:28 Athletic Abilities and Ethnic Differences
0:08:28 The Roadies of Life
0:11:51 Recognizing Unique Talents
0:15:24 The Cry of Unfairness
0:17:11 Embracing Differences in Relationships
0:18:37 Judging by Standards
0:23:56 Nature’s Design in Gender Roles
0:27:00 ...
Stefan Molyneux takes on a debate about feminism between Ana Kasparian and Pearl Davis in his Freedomain podcast. He discusses Pearl's arguments on women's roles in the economy, tying them to falling birth rates and broader effects on society. Molyneux breaks down some common misunderstandings in economic data and digs into the nuances of gender expectations and family life. In the end, he questions what modern feminism really means and encourages people to join the conversation.
Stefan will be there March 28, 2026, he hopes to see you there!
Find Word War Debate on X: https://x.com/WordWarDebate
0:00:00 Introduction to the Debate
0:01:10 Unpacking Feminism's Economic Impact
0:05:59 The Government's Role in Female Employment
0:14:17 Domestic Violence Statistics and Feminism
0:16:56 Title IX and Its Implications
0:23:08 The Debate on Modern Relationships
0:28:20 The Case of Terrence Pop
0:32:22 The Effects of Feminism on Men
0:41:01 The Statistics of Divorce
0:49:00 Child Support and Alimony ...
Excited to announce our brand-new Freedomain branded phone cases! We carry options for iPhone and Samsung models. 📱💭
Show off your love for philosophy on the go while keeping your device safe and stylish.
Head over to the shop now: https://shop.freedomain.com/
While you're browsing, why not snag a coffee mug ☕ or a comfy hoodie 🧥 to complete your collection?
Don't delay!
In this subscriber portion of Sunday Morning Live on the 11th of January, 2026, Stefan Molyneux delves into voting patterns and the "Karen" stereotype within politics. He looks at the longstanding friction between communism and white communities, considering its effects on job prospects for white men. In response to questions from listeners, he reviews how women appear in ads and what those images suggest about society. He questions stories in the media about encounters with police and touches on how social media shapes conversations. Toward the end, he shares thoughts on the cryptocurrency scene, focusing on Bitcoin, and talks about appreciation and connection while marking a milestone of his own.
Listen to the public portion of this livestream at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6260/the-shooting-of-renee-good
Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/4b6c61b3/the-myth-of-the-karen?accessCode=Freedomain2024
Audio: https://cdn.freedomain.com/FDRP/FDRP_myth_karen.mp3
Video: ...
Subscribers, let's talk philosophy!
Join the stream on Locals: https://fdrurl.com/locals-live
Not yet a subscriber?
You can subscribe today at Locals at https://fdrurl.com/locals
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.