If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
https://rumble.com/vmlvdc-how-to-deal-with-verbal-abuse.html
FROM A LISTENER:
People get "upset" when you brag about your supposed achievements because your narcissism and self-aggrandizement is absolutely blaring in this instance. How you don't see it as such an apparently intelligent person is completely mystifying to me. You did this hour long call-in show about why people point out your obvious narcissism, which is, in itself, highly narcissistic. You speak about self-knowledge, but you clearly have no self-knowledge at all if you can't see your own narcissism.
Your fuzzy math about how many kids you've saved from being abused is just hilarious. Like even if you have saved some kids from being abused, your ridiculous fly-by-night equations to get the numbers you did is just absurd. Like just say "I've saved children from being abused". Even I would agree with that, but when you try to quantify it with these ridiculous numbers, it shows how self-glorifying you are.
Even in this call in show, you ignore one of your listeners when he brings up the valid argument that in the show, you set up an impossible standard: you said that you'll only listen to criticism from people who can be shown to have saved children. As if that has any bearing on the validity of someone's argument. This is just a really weird Ad Hominem fallacy. "I'm not gonna listen to you because you don't work for CPS!"
The vast majority of people, obviously, can't demonstrably show that they've saved children from harm like some kind of caped superhero. That's an absurd, impossible standard. It's a complete fallacy. What you're doing is setting yourself up as being above criticism, given this impossible standard - as the caller rightly points out (albeit in a very timid manner).
The irony here is just absolutely astounding.
Is this what's become of the great Stefan Molyneux? Whining for an hour because of what one of his paying subscribers wrote on his locals page? Maybe it's time to think about retiring, man.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
In this 1 October 2025 X Space, Stefan discusses the case of Tyler Robinson, accused of shooting political figure Charlie Kirk, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the U.S. legal process. He reflects on the societal implications of violence tied to ideology and explores moral responsibilities surrounding punishment. Transitioning to finance, he warns about Bitcoin's unpredictability, urging critical thinking in legal and financial matters while advocating for open dialogue.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, ...
In this Freedomain X Space on the 30th of September 2025, philosopher Stefan Molyneux discusses the impact of early life decisions on morality, identity, and societal structures. Engaging with callers, he critiques IQ's role in social hierarchies and advocates for universal moral standards. Stefan emphasizes the courage to uphold truth despite societal backlash and encourages philosophical inquiry to navigate complexities and build societies on coherent moral truths.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful...
In this episode, I share a challenging experience from a live call with a caller, Bob, who raised philosophical questions about the is-ought dichotomy. I discuss my feelings of panic and discomfort as Bob's conflicting views on reality provoked a manipulative dialogue that questioned the integrity of our conversation. I analyze the emotional complexities of engaging with radical skepticism and emphasize the importance of a shared understanding in debates. This reflection invites listeners to consider the motivations behind their discussions and the ethical dimensions of pursuing objective truth.
The debate, "What on EARTH Is Real?" is at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6118/what-on-earth-is-real-twitterx-space
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/dc085e93/creeped-out-by-the-sep-30-2025-debate
Subscribers can access this content at:
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7330906/creeped-out-by-the-sep-30-2025-debate
Subscribestar: ...
How to marry without danger – and an update on Charlie Kirk’s shooter!
Click below to join LIVE!
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1lPJqvDjrrNxb
You can listen in on our regular streaming platforms:
YouTube: https://fdrurl.com/youtube-live
Locals: https://fdrurl.com/locals-live
Rumble: https://fdrurl.com/rumble-live
Odysee: https://fdrurl.com/odysee-live
DLive: https://fdrurl.com/dlive
Kick: https://fdrurl.com/kick
Unauthorized TV: https://fdrurl.com/uatv-live
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.