If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
All that I left behind...
Stef, do you think standard (not excessive; not a beating) corporal punishment can be responsible for teen and adult children subconsciously seeking physically abusive relationships? What about self harm, such a cutting oneself? In my American Deep South culture, most parents whip and spank their kids, but not all of us turn out this way. Thank you.
what are your thoughts on government funded therapist, people have told me that government funded therapists are phosticated hierarchy gangs that pray on peoples weaknesses to be happy.
Are there personality/psychological profiles for certain careers? For instance, women who go into the sex/porn industry were likely to have been sexually abused as children, but are there less obvious career choices that possibly have red flags? And how could I go about researching this?
I have found Practical Anarchy and Everyday Anarchy on your site. How do I find Achieving Anarchy?
since bomb in the brain what are some of the things you have discovered about child hood amnesia and have you found ways to reverse it.
Stef, what's the difference between anger and hate? Can we say any of them is inherently good or bad?
What's the best argument (if any) against the thesis that we should limit the spread of something like hate?
Stef, how do you know someone loves you? And specifically, how does a child know their parent loves them?
do you think it is hypocritical for people to judge people who were coerced to get the covid injections on the basis they were risking their lives when the people judging are paying tax so forfeiting part of their life to the state anyway? Is this a valid equivalence?
Hello and Merry Christmas Stefan! I was wondering if you could help me understand something: on a recent call in (with that Finnish girl who moved to Australia) you talked about how once you confront your abuser and start to assert your own needs and preferences, that they begin to see you not just an inanimate object into which they can pour their abuse, but as a real person who they have terribly hurt (you used the kitten in the pillow analogy). This is one reason why being confronted in such a way is so painful for the abuser. (Please correct me if I have misunderstood!) I thought that that was a really insightful and useful thing to explain, but it then made me wonder how that fits together with what you have said about how abusive people (usually) aren’t ignorant or misguided of the evil they do, as is often claimed, because they consciously hide their behaviour from public scrutiny; they purposely keep it behind closed doors. I was wondering how these two explanations (which I realize are not explaining the exact same thing) can be applicable to the same person. The first one seems to recognize that the abuser is somewhat unaware of the hurt they have done, but the second one shows how they are fully aware that what they are doing is morally inexcusable and abusive. I look forward to hearing what you have to say! Thanks.
is the current Tech field worth getting into or has wokism overtaken everything virtuous about the field?
how does one balance the desire to help others while also realizing so many people refuse to be helped? At what point does it become selfish and futile?
Isn’t trying to choose a woman for marriage who will not be corrupted by the state power of divorce & family court like trying to choose a dictator who will not be corrupted by general state power?
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
This clip comes from "Why Men Get No Compliments...", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6148
It's reason or it's blood. 💡🕊️
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
In this listener call-in, Stefan engages with a caller who reflects on the trauma of an abusive mother and the emotional toll it has taken on him as a father. The caller shares his decision to distance himself from her after a revealing conversation, exploring the complexities of familial relationships and the challenges faced by his wife in understanding his experiences.
They delve into themes of accountability, the necessity of healthy boundaries, and the impact of these dynamics on the caller's family. The discussion emphasizes the importance of honesty and resilience in overcoming past trauma while navigating the integrity of the family unit.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth ...
Stefan Molyneux critiques "The Sopranos," praising its storytelling while questioning female character portrayals and anti-Christian themes. He contrasts Tony Soprano’s violence with Carmela’s suburban life, exploring gender dynamics and moral complexity. Ultimately, he invites listeners to rethink narratives shaping our views on morality.
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/d922d786/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos
Subscribers can access this content at:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1980797732198514917
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7385399/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos
Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/posts/2140829
Freedomain: https://freedomain.com/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos/
Not yet a subscriber?
You can subscribe on:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025
Subscribestar: https://subscribestar.com/freedomain
Freedomain: https://fdrurl.com/members
...
The concept of Universal Consequentialism 😱
A year ago, I presented a different view of consequentialism in this community, which is to devide the concept into rational and irrational consequentialism.
Here's a different approach to explain what consequentialism actually is, based on an example Stefan is providing in his book "Peaceful Parenting", chapter 11, page 153, timestamp 38:19 in the audio book. Quote:
"Since you are all very clever readers, you will be replying to me in your mind something along the lines of this: 'Ah, you say, Mr. Philosopher, that no one can accurately predict the future, but you also state that hitting children has negative outcomes!'
That is certainly true – both that I make that claim, and that hitting children does have generally negative outcomes.
However, we do not judge the morality of hitting children based upon positive or negative outcomes.
For instance, we know that state control of the economy leads to massive inefficiencies – but we don't judge the morality of state control of ...
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.