If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Philosopher Stefan Molyneux answers questions!
What are the benefits of talk therapy and what should someone expect to do when starting talk therapy? What Do you expect from a session and things to do in between sessions?
Stefan we need you to go back on Twitter, we need an update on Taylor Swift’s eggs, even if this is the one and only thing you tweet, I need to see it because I want to watch and see the leftists go absolutely crazy 🤪🤪🤪🤪, I want to see #TaylorSEggs trending on Twitter!!! Hahahaha!!
Does cyber-bullying violate UPB?
Various forms of blackmail are illegal of course, much of which has been made easier in the social media age. The abuse through texts, and the digital manipulation games people play might be passive-aggressive, does that violate UPB?
Hello, Steff. An aunt in my extended family has recently shared that she was sexually abused by one of her siblings growing up. The large number of siblings who are now all above middle age, have not yet shown any signs of addressing this or treating the offender any different which is greatly hurting the victim. I would really appreciate some advice here. I think the other siblings need a nudge to deal with this obviously uncomfortable situation and fully understand that they are hurting their sister. For further context, I think they are all traumatized from a bad father and are ill equipped to deal with this without outside input.
What is your take on the Law of Assumption by Neville Goddard ?
I came across this as my girlfriend often assumes how I feel or think without asking, and she’s usually not accurate so I find it irritating. My line of work tends to take a mental toll on me, and sometimes it’s hard to be upbeat and happy, my partner then assumes I’m unhappy with her or I take work stress out on her.
We’ve been together a year and half, we live together in a house I bought before our relationship. She was untrustworthy early in our relationship, where I’m certain there was an affair. I felt a lot of resentment and it took me a long time to get over. She still denies anything happened and wanted to continue the relationship. I caught her lying a couple more times afterwards. But still foolishly stayed with her.
Now this past August, at a high school reunion I got way too drunk and ended up having a one night stand. I chose to say I got too drunk and don’t remember what happened, as parts of the night I didn’t actually remember. But after people talked around town and she had heard things from her friends I decided to come clean instead of continue lying. It was a terrible thing for me to do. I think it had been easier for me to lie about it since I had been lied to multiple times by her previously.
She since doesn’t trust me (understandably).
Lately I guess I’m just feeling battered by work and home life, is it time to throw in the white towel, get her to move out and start over anew?
We are in a viscous cycle for almost a year now. Where I had trust issues first, and now it’s her with the trust issues. there’s a lot more to it of course, but I’m trying to keep it shorter for the question.
I guess I’m curious of your opinion, can the law of assumption help to overcome trust boundaries and repair a relationship? I tend to be a more positive, deep thinking person whereas she’s been through lots of trauma in her life, assumes the worst in most cases and is oppositional defiant.
She is great in so many ways, but I know her childhood traumas cause her a lot of issues. It’s caused our relationship to suffer and now I’ve participated in doing serious damage myself.
At 30 years of age, I’m starting to feel the panic of finding the right partner to start a family with, but am I choosing the wrong person?
You often say it’s the individuals fault for staying with the person, and I do fear I may become one of these individuals who stayed with the wrong person.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
In this 1 October 2025 X Space, Stefan discusses the case of Tyler Robinson, accused of shooting political figure Charlie Kirk, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the U.S. legal process. He reflects on the societal implications of violence tied to ideology and explores moral responsibilities surrounding punishment. Transitioning to finance, he warns about Bitcoin's unpredictability, urging critical thinking in legal and financial matters while advocating for open dialogue.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, ...
In this Freedomain X Space on the 30th of September 2025, philosopher Stefan Molyneux discusses the impact of early life decisions on morality, identity, and societal structures. Engaging with callers, he critiques IQ's role in social hierarchies and advocates for universal moral standards. Stefan emphasizes the courage to uphold truth despite societal backlash and encourages philosophical inquiry to navigate complexities and build societies on coherent moral truths.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful...
In this episode, I share a challenging experience from a live call with a caller, Bob, who raised philosophical questions about the is-ought dichotomy. I discuss my feelings of panic and discomfort as Bob's conflicting views on reality provoked a manipulative dialogue that questioned the integrity of our conversation. I analyze the emotional complexities of engaging with radical skepticism and emphasize the importance of a shared understanding in debates. This reflection invites listeners to consider the motivations behind their discussions and the ethical dimensions of pursuing objective truth.
The debate, "What on EARTH Is Real?" is at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6118/what-on-earth-is-real-twitterx-space
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/dc085e93/creeped-out-by-the-sep-30-2025-debate
Subscribers can access this content at:
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7330906/creeped-out-by-the-sep-30-2025-debate
Subscribestar: ...
How to marry without danger – and an update on Charlie Kirk’s shooter!
Click below to join LIVE!
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1lPJqvDjrrNxb
You can listen in on our regular streaming platforms:
YouTube: https://fdrurl.com/youtube-live
Locals: https://fdrurl.com/locals-live
Rumble: https://fdrurl.com/rumble-live
Odysee: https://fdrurl.com/odysee-live
DLive: https://fdrurl.com/dlive
Kick: https://fdrurl.com/kick
Unauthorized TV: https://fdrurl.com/uatv-live
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.