If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
To access it, join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022
Why is UPB good?
UPB, or Universally Preferable Behavior, is considered good because it is based on the concept of a universal standard of truth, accuracy, and consistency. It asserts that there are behaviors that are universally preferable and that these behaviors cannot self-contradict. In other words, UPB promotes ethical principles that are consistent and applicable to all individuals. It provides a framework for evaluating and understanding moral choices and actions.
Why is truth good?
Truth is considered good because it allows us to accurately understand and navigate the world around us. When we seek truth, we strive for a correspondence between our beliefs and reality. Truth enables us to make informed decisions, solve problems, and pursue knowledge. It is through truth that we can build trust, establish meaningful relationships, and foster cooperation. In essence, truth is valued because it aligns us with reality and promotes clarity, understanding, and the pursuit of knowledge.
Can stealing be UPB?
Stealing cannot be Universally Preferable Behavior (UPB) because stealing involves the unwanted transfer of property. If stealing were UPB, it would mean that stealing is something that should be desired and accepted under all circumstances, at all times, and in all locations. However, if you want someone to take your property, it is not considered theft. For example, if you put your garbage in a bin by the side of the road and the garbage man takes it away, it is not theft because you wanted them to take it. Therefore, stealing cannot be universally preferable behavior as it contradicts the concept of unwanted property transfer.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
In this Wednesday Night Live on 14 January 2026, Stefan Molyneux examines the way watching sports has become a widespread distraction in society, pulling people away from more meaningful pursuits. He points out the health problems that can come from too much time spent on sports viewing, along with the intense demands placed on kids in competitive athletics. Molyneux pushes back against common assumptions by stressing the value of looking at personal stories, and he urges people to focus on their own development rather than just sitting back and watching others. The discussion covers how sports influence culture in various ways.
0:00:00 Introduction to Sports and Their Impact
0:10:49 The Cost of Sports Consumption
0:23:47 The Rise of Fantasy Sports
0:31:23 The Dark Side of Sports Gambling
0:32:14 Government Funding and Sports Infrastructure
0:47:40 The Risks of Youth Sports Injuries
0:48:13 The Reality of Sports Expectations
0:53:30 The Athlete Privilege Phenomenon
0:59:20 Substance Abuse in ...
Stefan Molyneux takes on the notion that true ethics must come straight from God's orders, pointing out how morals drawn from holy books end up being pretty subjective, with people interpreting them in all sorts of ways. He responds to someone's worry about what happens without divine rules by noting that, unlike hard science, religious morals don't hold up the same across the board. Drawing from Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, he shows how followers disagree on basics like forgiveness or following divine laws. Molyneux digs into the past tensions between these religions and the mixed messages in their ethical advice, which makes him doubt whether divine say-so really settles right and wrong. He pushes people to think about their own biases in judging morals and cautions against leaning on religious teachings to back up decisions, suggesting instead a closer look at one's own sense of ethics.
0:00:00 Objective Morality Debate
0:01:31 The Illusion of Divine Guidance
0:03:18 The Complexity of Forgiveness
...
Stefan Molyneux looks back at Scott Adams' life and work now that he's gone. He mentions how Adams' creations resonated with him over the years, touches on the mixed aspects of Adams' time in the spotlight, and notes the way he dealt with his approaching death. Molyneux reviews Adams' evolving take on the COVID-19 vaccine and explains his own stance against getting vaccinated, while pointing out that people should decide for themselves. He considers whether Adams' habits and the demands of public life contributed to his prostate cancer. Molyneux also discusses stress and its effects on the body, suggesting that folks focus on solid character when choosing who to keep close and take stock of their priorities.
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/500abd01/on-the-death-of-scott-adams
Subscribers can access this content at:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux/status/2011472099777393114
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7601218/on-the-death-of-scott-adams
Subscribestar: ...
Excited to announce our brand-new Freedomain branded phone cases! We carry options for iPhone and Samsung models. 📱💭
Show off your love for philosophy on the go while keeping your device safe and stylish.
Head over to the shop now: https://shop.freedomain.com/
While you're browsing, why not snag a coffee mug ☕ or a comfy hoodie 🧥 to complete your collection?
Don't delay!
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.