If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
To access it, join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022
Why is UPB good?
UPB, or Universally Preferable Behavior, is considered good because it is based on the concept of a universal standard of truth, accuracy, and consistency. It asserts that there are behaviors that are universally preferable and that these behaviors cannot self-contradict. In other words, UPB promotes ethical principles that are consistent and applicable to all individuals. It provides a framework for evaluating and understanding moral choices and actions.
Why is truth good?
Truth is considered good because it allows us to accurately understand and navigate the world around us. When we seek truth, we strive for a correspondence between our beliefs and reality. Truth enables us to make informed decisions, solve problems, and pursue knowledge. It is through truth that we can build trust, establish meaningful relationships, and foster cooperation. In essence, truth is valued because it aligns us with reality and promotes clarity, understanding, and the pursuit of knowledge.
Can stealing be UPB?
Stealing cannot be Universally Preferable Behavior (UPB) because stealing involves the unwanted transfer of property. If stealing were UPB, it would mean that stealing is something that should be desired and accepted under all circumstances, at all times, and in all locations. However, if you want someone to take your property, it is not considered theft. For example, if you put your garbage in a bin by the side of the road and the garbage man takes it away, it is not theft because you wanted them to take it. Therefore, stealing cannot be universally preferable behavior as it contradicts the concept of unwanted property transfer.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
This clip comes from "DO I GET OWNED BY A PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR? Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6101
Ever wonder why theft can never be universally acceptable? 🤔 It's a self-defeating idea! Respecting property rights is always possible and logical. Let’s talk about why respecting property rights matters! 💡
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
This clip comes from "DO I GET OWNED BY A PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR? Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6101
Communism fails on moral and practical grounds. Property rights are the key to freedom and efficiency! 🚀 When they’re denied, only a few control everything.💡
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
Stefan Molyneux critiques "The Sopranos," praising its storytelling while questioning female character portrayals and anti-Christian themes. He contrasts Tony Soprano’s violence with Carmela’s suburban life, exploring gender dynamics and moral complexity. Ultimately, he invites listeners to rethink narratives shaping our views on morality.
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/d922d786/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos
Subscribers can access this content at:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1980797732198514917
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7385399/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos
Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/posts/2140829
Freedomain: https://freedomain.com/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos/
Not yet a subscriber?
You can subscribe on:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025
Subscribestar: https://subscribestar.com/freedomain
Freedomain: https://fdrurl.com/members
...
The concept of Universal Consequentialism 😱
A year ago, I presented a different view of consequentialism in this community, which is to devide the concept into rational and irrational consequentialism.
Here's a different approach to explain what consequentialism actually is, based on an example Stefan is providing in his book "Peaceful Parenting", chapter 11, page 153, timestamp 38:19 in the audio book. Quote:
"Since you are all very clever readers, you will be replying to me in your mind something along the lines of this: 'Ah, you say, Mr. Philosopher, that no one can accurately predict the future, but you also state that hitting children has negative outcomes!'
That is certainly true – both that I make that claim, and that hitting children does have generally negative outcomes.
However, we do not judge the morality of hitting children based upon positive or negative outcomes.
For instance, we know that state control of the economy leads to massive inefficiencies – but we don't judge the morality of state control of ...
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.