If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
"The Nature of Principles
After debating Stefan and some from this community about what consequentialism actually is, I got the impression that there's a big misconception about what principles actually are. So let's go through the logic:
1. Definition of Consequentialism:
"Consequentialism is an ethical theory that asserts the moral rightness or wrongness of actions is determined solely by their outcomes or consequences."
That definition is correct. But there's a misconception attached to that, namely that consequentialism contradicts principle based morals. That assumption is incorrect, because principles already are defined by consequences.
2. Definition of Principle:
"A principle is a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of beliefs or behavior or a chain of reasoning."
For example, the moral principle of UPB is that the violation of property rights is bad. That's a judgement, based on the consequence that any acceptance of the violation of property rights will result in the loss of logical consistency, which then will result in the loss of certainty of the law. In other words: The principle is made because we want to prevent any logical inconsistency to justify injustice.
So here's a request: If you disagree with what I've just explained, please provide an example of a moral principle that's not defined by its consequences.
Just one."
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Wednesday Night Live 20 August 2025
Philosopher Stefan Molyneux explore the intersections of philosophy, personal challenges, and belief systems. He discusses the evolution of HR practices away from productivity and towards ideological compliance, questioning the influence of leftist ideologies on corporate efficiency. Through engaging calls, he shares insights from watching "Dear Liar," prompting a critique of societal conditioning versus individual talent.
Stef and callers delve into belief systems, drawing on Stef's atheistic perspective and the importance of logical reasoning over emotional conviction. The conversation navigates the themes of personal responsibility versus victimhood, encouraging listeners to embrace humility while confronting their realities. Concluding with personal narratives of overcoming struggles, Stefan invites further dialogue, urging an active pursuit of understanding and self-discovery through philosophical inquiry.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
...
The episode offers an in-depth conversation between Stefan and a 23-year-old caller struggling with feelings of emptiness post-conversion to Catholicism. The discussion reveals the caller's affluent but isolating upbringing, marked by the early death of his mother and the pressures to excel academically in music. The pandemic exacerbated his challenges, leading to a breakdown and withdrawal from music school. The conversation explores his anxiety, social awkwardness, particularly in romantic contexts, and his complex family dynamics, where differing ideological views have further isolated him. Stefan encourages the caller to reframe his perceptions of relationships and mental health, promoting social engagement as a means to combat isolation. The episode underscores the interplay between personal history, mental health, and the necessity of community and connections in overcoming feelings of purposelessness.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE...
Thank you for the most amazing journey a man can endure!
This was my first published article, October 24 2005
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2005/10/stefan-molyneux/the-stateless-society-an-examination-of-alte
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.