If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Hi Stef, what role should history play in determining philosophical truths or falsehoods? I ask this question knowing your background in history and how you have integrated it into your communication of philosophy, however, the point of conflict for me is this.
When history is used as evidence for a problem existing, the debate is then about causality rather than principles.
Since causality can't be proven with certainty, neither is it encouraged because we have free will, the utility of a philosophical claim rests on whether or not the person is persuaded by the causality you have presented. From a logical and syllogistic point of view, the argument might be valid, but it might not be true without the empirical evidence to back it up since put simply, truth is a status that a claim has relative to its correspondence with the world.
For example, if you were to say child abuse is wrong, and use reason alone to make that argument, someone might not be convinced that how we treat children is even a problem. As such, you’ll then need to use history to support your reasoning. You would examine the French revolution, the childhoods of people in call-ins, look at other literature and research that uses a greater data set of human history to investigate if how we treat children is a problem.
At this point, someone might then be convinced since you have presented them with history, but maybe instead they’ll debate you on the causality of historical events. You won’t be able to convince them through principles, nor history. You could even try delve into their childhood only for them to say that they turned out alright.
At this point, we determine that the person can’t be reasoned with regarding this topic and move on, however, the problem remains regarding the role that history plays in making a philosophical claim that is valid, useful. If people can’t accept a truth statement, it isn’t useful even if it is true. History seems to be indispensable in persuading other people to accept truth statements, however, the battle is then about causality and how it is perceived or interpreted rather than principles.
If the first battle as a philosopher is about making valid truth statements, is the next battle about using history to persuade others of their validity, thereby rendering them ‘useful’? Is the final battle for the human mind about causality now that UPB is in the picture?
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
NOW AVAILABLE FOR SUBSCRIBERS: MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING' - AND THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI AND AUDIOBOOK!
Also get the Truth About the French Revolution, the interactive multi-lingual philosophy AI trained on thousands of hours of my material, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!
See you soon!
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
This clip comes from "DO I GET OWNED BY A PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR? Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6101
Ever wonder why theft can never be universally acceptable? 🤔 It's a self-defeating idea! Respecting property rights is always possible and logical. Let’s talk about why respecting property rights matters! 💡
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
This clip comes from "DO I GET OWNED BY A PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR? Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6101
Communism fails on moral and practical grounds. Property rights are the key to freedom and efficiency! 🚀 When they’re denied, only a few control everything.💡
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
Stefan Molyneux critiques "The Sopranos," praising its storytelling while questioning female character portrayals and anti-Christian themes. He contrasts Tony Soprano’s violence with Carmela’s suburban life, exploring gender dynamics and moral complexity. Ultimately, he invites listeners to rethink narratives shaping our views on morality.
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/d922d786/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos
Subscribers can access this content at:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1980797732198514917
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7385399/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos
Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/posts/2140829
Freedomain: https://freedomain.com/the-philosophy-of-the-sopranos/
Not yet a subscriber?
You can subscribe on:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025
Subscribestar: https://subscribestar.com/freedomain
Freedomain: https://fdrurl.com/members
...
Talking Lord of the Rings...
Set a reminder to join the space LIVE:
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1RDGlALVqMdJL
You can also listen via our streaming platforms:
YouTube: https://fdrurl.com/youtube-live
Locals: https://fdrurl.com/locals-live
Rumble: https://fdrurl.com/rumble-live
Odysee: https://fdrurl.com/odysee-live
DLive: https://fdrurl.com/dlive
Kick: https://fdrurl.com/kick
Unauthorized TV: https://fdrurl.com/uatv-live
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.