If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Â
This clip comes from AI Will Save the Birthrate!, get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/5892
Leaving academia for the free market was the best decision I ever made! 😄 But let's talk about the hypocrisy I've witnessed...
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
A debate following up from podcast 6046, "DOES TWO AND TWO MAKE FOUR? Twitter/X Space": https://fdrpodcasts.com/6046/does-two-and-two-make-four-twitterx-space
In this episode, I explore the philosophical complexities of truth and context in mathematics, sparked by the statement "two and two make four." We discuss how context influences interpretations across numerical systems and the importance of clarity in communication. The conversation delves into the psychological aspects of certainty and the societal implications of uncertainty in moral judgments. I argue that doubts about logical truths can weaken moral reasoning. Ultimately, we emphasize the necessity of a rational foundation of knowledge to tackle philosophical inquiries and promote moral integrity.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for ...
22 July 2025
This lecture explores the is-ought dichotomy, analyzing David Hume's assertion that moral imperatives cannot be directly derived from factual statements. The speaker critiques the selective use of this principle in secular morality and legal contexts, arguing that moral judgments often reflect subjective views rather than objective truths. The discussion emphasizes that engagements in debate carry intrinsic ethical standards, suggesting that while strict derivation may be problematic, a shared understanding of moral imperatives can emerge within secular discourse, enriching the conversation around ethics.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on ...
Brothers and sisters in thought, let's do some philosophy tonight! Bring your thoughts, questions, concerns, issues, feedback, critique, and we shall plumb the depths!
https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7162926/freedomain-supporters-livestream-with-stefan-molyneux
This will be a supporters only stream from the top! Join for free to catch the entire stream!
Brothers and sisters in thought, let's do some philosophy tonight! Bring your thoughts, questions, concerns, issues, feedback, critique, and we shall plumb the depths!
https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7162926/freedomain-supporters-livestream-with-stefan-molyneux
This will be a supporters only stream from the top! Join for free to catch the entire stream!
@freedomain On the topic of 2+2=4, in math there are such things as complex numbers. To put it simply, it extends the number line from a 1 dimensional line to a 2 dimensional plane. The "i" component is the Y axis, while the "real" component is the X axis. The number 4 is written as "4+i×0", or just "4". If you move up 2 steps on the Y axis you get the complex number "4+i×2".
While this is a purely mathematical concept and may appear to have nothing to do with philosophy or real life, complex numbers have practical utility in various situations such as in fluid dynamics, AC circuit analysis, signal processing etc. So they do seem to point to real world phenomena and behavior of matter and energy.
Now imagine a 1 dimensional being who only deals with "real" numbers and is blissfully unaware of "i" AKA the Y axis. "2+2=(4+i×2)", which is false, would appear to him as "2+2=4". However to his knowledge and point of view these equations are equal and interchange. It's like an ant who can move ...
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Â