If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Sunday Morning Live DONORS ONLY 13 July 2025
I share the first draft of a new chapter from my new novel!
Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/d0f942d2/private-donor-livestream-a-chapter-from-my-new
Subscribers can access this content at:
Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7108257/private-donor-livestream-a-chapter-from-my-new-novel
Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/posts/1964908
Freedomain: https://freedomain.com/private-donor-livestream-a-chapter-from-my-new-novel/
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Not yet a subscriber? You can join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!
You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!
See you soon!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
A debate following up from podcast 6046, "DOES TWO AND TWO MAKE FOUR? Twitter/X Space": https://fdrpodcasts.com/6046/does-two-and-two-make-four-twitterx-space
In this episode, I explore the philosophical complexities of truth and context in mathematics, sparked by the statement "two and two make four." We discuss how context influences interpretations across numerical systems and the importance of clarity in communication. The conversation delves into the psychological aspects of certainty and the societal implications of uncertainty in moral judgments. I argue that doubts about logical truths can weaken moral reasoning. Ultimately, we emphasize the necessity of a rational foundation of knowledge to tackle philosophical inquiries and promote moral integrity.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for ...
22 July 2025
This lecture explores the is-ought dichotomy, analyzing David Hume's assertion that moral imperatives cannot be directly derived from factual statements. The speaker critiques the selective use of this principle in secular morality and legal contexts, arguing that moral judgments often reflect subjective views rather than objective truths. The discussion emphasizes that engagements in debate carry intrinsic ethical standards, suggesting that while strict derivation may be problematic, a shared understanding of moral imperatives can emerge within secular discourse, enriching the conversation around ethics.
FOLLOW ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on ...
The Midwits of X! Come talk philosophy my friends!
@freedomain On the topic of 2+2=4, in math there are such things as complex numbers. To put it simply, it extends the number line from a 1 dimensional line to a 2 dimensional plane. The "i" component is the Y axis, while the "real" component is the X axis. The number 4 is written as "4+i×0", or just "4". If you move up 2 steps on the Y axis you get the complex number "4+i×2".
While this is a purely mathematical concept and may appear to have nothing to do with philosophy or real life, complex numbers have practical utility in various situations such as in fluid dynamics, AC circuit analysis, signal processing etc. So they do seem to point to real world phenomena and behavior of matter and energy.
Now imagine a 1 dimensional being who only deals with "real" numbers and is blissfully unaware of "i" AKA the Y axis. "2+2=(4+i×2)", which is false, would appear to him as "2+2=4". However to his knowledge and point of view these equations are equal and interchangeable. It's like an ant who can move ...
Brothers and sisters in thought, let's do some philosophy tonight! Bring your thoughts, questions, concerns, issues, feedback, critique, and we shall plumb the depths!
https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7162926/freedomain-supporters-livestream-with-stefan-molyneux
This will be a supporters only stream from the top! Join for free to catch the entire stream!
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.