Freedomain
Politics • Culture • Lifestyle
The Present
Chapters 11-12
February 06, 2023

Chapter 11

Ian shifted on the hard wooden floor.

“You seem distracted,” he whispered.

After a moment, Oliver blinked and turned around.

“I am…”

“Maybe this isn’t the best time to teach me how to shoot.”

Oliver took a deep breath. “You’re right, I’m sorry.”

“Where are you at?”

“There is a map in my mind,” murmured Oliver. “It’s always going on, from here to the Middle East, off the Cape of Good Hope, circling by China, coming into California. It’s like the thump thump of a heart. Bringing us everything we need to live – in the style to which we have become accustomed.”

Oliver’s middle brother David grunted softly. “Yeah, you were a total space-case at the barbecue. Gapping out completely.”

His brother-in-law William said nothing, but nodded slightly.

A slight breeze ruffled through the deer blind – a raised wooden structure about 15 feet up in the woods. Two fake deer stood across the clearing about 100 feet away.

The men had come out early in the morning, climbed up into the deer blind, and had been sitting for almost three hours. They had only seen a line of young turkeys winding their way across the clearing.

“Was it Jayda?” asked David.

Oliver shook his head. “Yeah, she’s a hassle, but too much of a cliché to worry much about…”

“Lot of her type around these days, though,” murmured William.

Oliver shrugged slightly, the movement of his shoulders barely visible under his thick camouflaged jacket. “We have always been sent out as lambs among wolves…”

“Diane is not having the best pregnancy at the moment,” whispered William.

Ian said: “Should we bother whispering? I’m not sure anything’s… coming.”

“We’ll never know if we raise our voices,” murmured Oliver.

David said: “This would be totally easier if we were drinkers - I think that’s why most men do it.”

“This is not recreational,” snapped Oliver.

“Well, I agree with that!” shot back David. “My ass went to sleep an hour ago, now it’s going to be up all night!”

“All right, keep it down, bro.”

There was a pause. The endless circling crows croaked from the whirlpools of air above them.

“Seriously, though - she’s looking for comfort,” said William eventually.

Oliver shook his head tightly. “Can’t give that.”

William exhaled. “Hell of a time…”

Oliver stared across the clearing at the slow blowing treetops. “We been waiting for this – since the day we were born.”

William shuddered. “Wish it wasn’t my time.”

Oliver snorted. “Would you have preferred World War II? Vietnam? The Civil War? World War I?” Oliver gestured at the grey clouds, the ashen landscape around them. “This has always been the devil’s playground. We are to the gods as flies to wanton boys – they kill us for their sport.”

“Or us to absent dear,” smiled Ian.

“Look, Ian,” said Oliver impatiently, “hunting is a game of waiting. We’re not at the damn grocery store!”

“Sorry, man.”

The older man shook his head. “No, that’s me, I’m sorry. It’s kind of – important that we get something today.”

“Why today? In particular?”

“It’s all – stopping…” whispered Oliver. There was enough latent horror in his words to halt the breath of his companions.

Everyone knew his business. They waited.

“I’m trying to get some parts to repair some high-end ovens – one part, just a motherboard. I’ve been waiting three months. Normally you just jump on ‘Ali Baba’ and you can find whatever you need – someone always has something… And things have been – jammed up at the ports forever – strikes, Covid, quarantines, mandates – and then, things get off the ships finally – after thirty, sixty days – and then get stuck in a warehouse because the trucks aren’t rolling. But that’s just – moving things after they are already in the country… Things are – slowing down, stopping – at the source, not just the destination…”

Oliver’s eyes were distant.

David cleared his throat. “Yeah, but do..? We can survive with what we make in America. Who cares about cheap drones from Taiwan?”

Oliver shook his head grimly. “We don’t make our own pharmaceuticals anymore. We get most of our fertilizer from overseas. Oil drilling has been shut down for years…”

“But we can just – start that up again. If we have to…”

“Normally, I’d agree. We’re problem solvers, that’s our heritage… But government has totally jammed up the works – more than ever. Everything needs a license, everything is paperwork, everything is delays… I counted the other day – almost half my colleagues over fifty have taken early retirement. Their new hobby is scrambling for second passports. Renaldo is trying to track down the birth certificate of his grandfather from New Zealand. They’re joining the super-rich, buying up compounds and survival bunkers at the ass-end of the world…” Oliver’s right hand descended slowly in front of his face. “And families are just – cut in two. Hacked into opposing camps. We only have Jayda, but most families are just – staring across this burning trench of - belief. Ideology… Vaccinated and unvaccinated, left versus right, racism versus diversity, men against women… And we’re just doing this weird – dance, right at the edge of the volcano. And it’s rumbly, and hot as hell down there…” Oliver shook his head rapidly. “I’m not making much sense…”

“Shhh!” hissed David, pointing out of the blind.

Three deer stood across the clearing, noses towards the fake deer. A father, a mother – and a baby, a foal…

“Oh, we can’t – the baby…” whispered William.

“Ever eaten veal?” asked Oliver grimly, raising his rifle.

“Can I try?” asked Ian, his voice shaking with excitement.

“We’ll do it together,” winked Oliver. “Anything that hits comes from me… Remember the recoil…”

The four men lifted their rifles, rested them on the low wooden wall of the blind, closed one eye, and gazed down the sights with the other.

The deer stood rigid.

“Which one are we aiming for?” whispered Ian, his lips barely moving.

“The dad,” murmured Oliver. “Three, two – one!”

In a clap of staccato thunder, the guns erupted in smoke. Ian’s rifle skidded backwards against his cheek, and he cried out in pain.

Two of the deer – the foal and the doe – leapt into the air, fell awkwardly and then skidded off on their impossibly skinny legs into the tangled brown brush. Oliver reloaded quickly, shooting twice more.

“Holy crap!” cried Ian, his eyes ablaze, his hand cupping his cheek.

Lowering his gun, Oliver turned to him. “Let’s see – open up… Yeah, that’s gonna leave a bruise… Just tell people that your wife beat you up for watching anime – it’s less embarrassing than losing control of your gun.”

Ian laughed. “Holy hell, my heart is pounding like a rabbit!”

David tried jumping up, but lurched sideways against the wooden wall. “Well – aargh!” he cried. “Maybe I’ve been sitting too long..? Hard to tell…”

Oliver and William stood up slowly, carefully – and then helped Ian to his feet.

“Let’s go get ’im,” said Oliver. “Let’s not repeat last year, and have to track a wounded buck for half a day…”

“God no,” agreed William fervently. Oliver shot him a look.

“Gosh, sorry,” corrected William.

The four men lowered themselves down the ladder, and made their way across the clearing.

The buck was lying on its side, its legs moving slowly, its breath rasping.

“Two clean hits,” said Oliver, pointing at the neck and hind leg. “Eeny meeny miny mo, I hit the deer in the neck fo’ sho’…”

“Dibs on the haunch-hit!” cried David.

“Dang!” laughed Ian. “You say whatever you want, I’m telling Cassie I blew its head off!”

Oliver trotted slowly into the bush, ducking low under the brittle brown pine branches. He scanned left and right.

“I don’t think I hit anything else – look around, let’s check…”

The men fanned out, searching as best they could – raising their hands, to keep the dry pine branches from scratching their eyes.

After a few minutes, they returned.

“Well, that is a fine set of meals, right there!” grinned David.

Ian frowned. “Uh – I never really asked about the next part. I’m guessing it’s kind of like a horror movie?”

“Only for the deer,” grunted Oliver. He opened his backpack and pulled out a large knife. Kneeling down, he swiftly slit the neck of the dying deer. Its forelegs scrambled madly as it bled out in red splashes on the sparse grass.

After a minute, Oliver handed the knife to Ian. “Okay, virgin, you get to cut the ass.”

Ian blinked. “We start with the – ass?”

“Yeah – the ass, then up to the neck – but don’t pierce the abdominal wall, whatever you do.”

Ian made a retching sound.

“Welcome to nature’s pantry, brother!” said David, patting him hard on the back.

Ian looked vaguely seasick. “Can’t we just – throw it in the back of the truck, pay someone else to do it?”

David laughed. “Sure, and we can pay someone else to eat it, and make sweet, sweet love to your wife at the same time!”

“All right, all right…”

“Spread its legs like it’s your wedding night,” grinned Oliver.

“Okay, this is all kinds of – Lord of the Flies,” grunted Ian, squatting down and opening the buck’s hind legs.

Oliver knelt down easily beside him. “You will be absolutely shocked how easily this comes to you. And how much you will learn to love it!”

 

After the deer was gutted, the men sat cross-legged around the circle of blood.

“Oliver,” said William softly. “I need you to – tell us the truth. I feel like you’re always – beating around the bush. Trying to spare us. Me, perhaps. But your sister is pregnant, man. What is going to happen?”

Oliver nodded slowly. He suddenly inhaled deeply.

“Well – it’s been a roller coaster, before… Way up and down, but you’re still on the track… Like the housing crisis – or even further back, the Internet bust – that one hit dad like a ton of bricks…” He shrugged. “This isn’t like anything I’ve ever seen. It’s all coming down, all coming apart… Like that old saying – how does a really rich man go bankrupt? Well, very slowly – then very quickly… It’s the same thing with countries. Cultures. We refuse to suffer through any recessions – necessary realignments of capital and labour. We’re like addicts – we want to avoid the little suffering, so we end up with a really – big suffering…”

“Ollie,” said William slowly. “You know I love you, brother, but you really have to learn how to get to the point!”

Oliver stared at him, then gestured at the remains of the deer. “Get used to it.”

There was a long, wide silence as the men stared down into the earth – and deep through the tunnel of time, to the watching faces of their ancestors.

Oliver spoke very slowly. “Every human life on this planet is propped up by $30,000 of debt – and that was the last time I checked, heaven knows what it is now…” He held each man’s eyes. “And we are Christians, we know that every debt has to be paid… The devil came to us in the 1920s – and again in the 1960s – and offered everything for free.” Oliver shrugged sadly. “And we grabbed at it, as we always do, because we are fallen. And we lacked love, and we lacked integrity – and morality. We did not love our children enough, so we buried them in debt. We sold our integrity, so we bribed the less fortunate rather than help them up directly. We scorned virtue, so we participated in theft. And morality is based on scarcity…” He snapped his fingers. “When we could just – print money, there was never any need for any – discipline. We evolved in the cold, but mad money heated our greed like the tropics, so we lost our history… Yeah, I know – be direct…”

Oliver took a deep breath. “We don’t have long – maybe two – maybe a month.”

Ian swallowed. “A mon… A month for…”

Oliver stared at him. “A month to get what we need to survive for a long time without the supply chain. Without grocery stores. Without running water. Without electricity… We all know that cities are forty-eight hours from anarchy – always, all the time. Come on, don’t give me those faces – I’ve been nagging you all for months about this. Look – mathematically, whatever can not last will not last! I’m not taking you hunting for the fun of it. You need to learn this stuff!”

“In a month?” cried William.

Ian’s eyes were wide. “Hey, my wife is pregnant too!”

Oliver jumped up. His cheeks were red. “What on earth are you getting upset with me for? Who did your wives vote for? Did you ever talk to them about giving up free healthcare, insane pensions, the welfare state?” He took a deep breath, struggling to calm himself. “I know, there’s no point blaming people – we are the fallen, this will always happen – unless this is the end, and we all get to go home finally…”

David suddenly laughed. “Dude – you need to get a girlfriend!”

Oliver smiled sadly. “I love you guys, I love your kids – and I hope to hell that you don’t regret having them. I’m being straight! Get the food, get the supplies, and get out of the city!”

“A month?”

“Check your emails. Remember the barbecue, remember the picnic last summer, I’ve been all over this forever!”

Ian shook his head in a daze. “Surely this would be – there would be more – word about this!”

“For what? To save things? You’ve told me what’s been happening with Ben. How hard it is to have any kind of – authority with your wife. Any credibility. That’s all the result of all of this – violent excess, this drug, this cocaine of debt and money printing. Why the hell would anyone want to save this – crap-show?”

William murmured: “Gabriel, blow the trumpets…”

Oliver’s voice was thick with emotion. “I’ve never felt closer to the Bible that I have over the last six months… God is bringing us closer… We are always at our best when we are being persecuted – when we remember what we are supposed to live for. For Him, for heaven, for – the afterlife…”

“Then – why fight it at all?” William’s voice was hollow.

“You’re going to become a father again, Bill,” said Oliver softly. “That choice is out of your hands.”

David suddenly began doing jumping jacks. “Holy crap, I’m like drowning in adrenaline!” he cried. “Blow it off!” He danced over and punched his older brother’s shoulder. “Come on, what the heck, let’s wear the asses of animals and live in caves!”

Despite himself, Oliver smiled. “Yeah, we’re going to need a court jester!”

Ian stood up slowly and turned all the way around. “Oliver, with all respect, we’re supposed to just – abandon everything?”

“You’re not understanding,” said Oliver slowly. “Everything is stopping – there won’t be anything to abandon. It’s not a diet if you can’t get food!”

William said: “How common is this – knowledge?”

“As I said… Go read the news – half the billionaires are buying bunkers in New Zealand. There’s a whole canyon of information out there that you don’t know, that I don’t know – only a few people have access to it… Watch them, what they do. They are the canaries in the coal mine…”

“It’s going to be a race war,” asked William slowly.

“Who cares what it is going to be?” cried Oliver. “The whole point is to just – get away from it all! We all need to be at least two gas tanks away from the city. Arm up – legally. Get your food, get your seeds, get your rain barrels – get your medicines. Why do you think I’ve been telling you all to work out and stay healthy? Going to be kind of tough to get insulin after the apocalypse!”

“My God,” murmured Ian. “What are the women going to do?”

“Women have been through all of this before…” Oliver saw their expressions, and shook his head. “Not past lives, I’m not a blasphemer – but we’ve evolved to change rapidly – pivot – when circumstances require.” He smiled suddenly. “You wouldn’t believe how popular I’ve become with the ladies. One stalked me at a conference. They know what’s coming, deep down…”

“What – what will they do?”

Oliver laughed. “Well, first thing they’ll do is drop all this pathological altruism. They’ll stop sleeping around. Wasting time… They’ll stop being so – picky. They’ll stop pretending that they can vote a provider into existence… But who cares, that’s all just – theory.”

He gestured at the carcass, the bullseye of blood around them.

“We’ve been out for a hunt, we got good meat – now we are going to get in the truck and drive to the feed store. Because this time next month, it will all be gone!”

Ian swallowed, and said: “And then – to church?”

Oliver clapped him on the back, laughing heartily. “Of course, brother! I’m not just hunting deer today!”

 

 

Chapter 12

When Rachel and Arlo went on their first dinner dates, they would see older couples staring off into space, or at their phones, instead of talking – and they would ridicule these proximate disconnected statues, vowing of course to never be like that!

Then, over the course of their relationship, they went through phases of intimacy and distance – like a lengthy heartbeat, they got close, then recoiled or drifted apart. It was like they had two separate lives that spread apart, then came together, like train tracks in a wilderness. When they were in the same mood, or facing the same issues, or had mutual problems to solve, they stayed up late talking. Then, when life took them in different directions, they didn’t even wave goodbye as they drifted apart. They considered this to be mature, that they wanted each other, but didn’t desperately need each other.

The night they went for dinner at Rachel’s parent’s house, each was struggling to find a way to connect before the socializing began.

Arlo’s parents were gleefully “burning up the inheritance” – as they put it – via endless travel. They were both embroiled in the high-end art world, and had what seemed to Rachel to be a rather suspicious amount of cash lying around the house. Arlo’s father had been a model; his mother a curator and auctioneer. In the arid, often creepy, world of modern art, they had moved like glass sharks through the clear waters of cultural catastrophe. All the people in Arlo’s childhood photos had some strange attribute – blue glasses far too small, obviously-fake beehive hairdos, giant black hoops embedded in their earlobes – and always held their heads slightly to one side or the other, like quizzical owls regarding a corpse. They were all atheists, all left-wing and used endless elaborate terminology to cover up their fetish for destruction.

His parents had offered Arlo use of their townhome, which was blindingly white, barely furnished, and with art on the wall that Rachel always found deeply unsettling. Portraits of doughy blank-faced people surrounded by oversized dogs with bloody teeth, family portraits with misshapen people in 1920s outfits, a birdcage covered in bloody feathers, dead-eyed children with hands tied over their heads and so on.

Arlo refused to spend a single night in the townhouse, and only visited it twice a month, to flush the toilets and clean up the mail. He never mentioned any particular trauma, but his avoidance was absolute.

Rachel’s parents were solidly lower middle class. Her father was a foreman at a factory that produced custom T-shirts – a job he had held for almost 30 years – and her mother was a part-time bookkeeper. They went bowling, visited their church twice a week, did charity work for the elderly, and had sensible hobbies. Rachel’s father had built an elaborate model train set in the basement, and Rachel’s mother loved collecting duck ornaments, and crocheting.

They had none of the anxiety that drove Rachel. Visiting them was like trying to run through thick Jell-O – they existed in a peculiar state of timelessness. The ambition to change the world and be recognized and noticed was as foreign to them as a Kurosawa film in the original Japanese. To Rachel’s mind, they plodded along – or rather, round and round, in a revolving door to nowhere – with no real sense of time or growth or decay…

Arlo loved them, though. He shared a similar sense of humour with Rachel’s father, and took deep pleasure in her mother’s homeliness. They recognized his looks, and gave him occasional compliments, but also tried to reach past the glare of his beauty, to reach his – soul, or something…

He visibly relaxed in their presence – and their home was relaxing, with its occasional chirps from the dark wooden cuckoo clock, the linoleum tabletop in the kitchen, and the rows of duck ornaments on every windowsill. It always seemed darker than outside, yellow-lit and womb-like. The solid unflappability of Rachel’s parents was like a deep anchor in a wide storm – the shivering storm of modernity.

Even their names – Bert and Ethel – seemed like musty exhalations from the cellar door of the distant past.

 

Rachel and Arlo said very little on the drive. Their random pendulums were currently at their most distant arc. Up until as recently as a year ago, they would strive to find topics to bridge the gap, but now they simply sat in silence – comfortable silence, they said to themselves.

They parked their creaky car in silence, stepped out in silence, walked up the mossy stepping-stones in silence. Only their knocking broke the quiet.

As always, Rachel’s mother opened the door.

“Rachel, Arlo, great to see you, come in, come in!”

She beamed, wiping her hands on a tea cloth, her slightly stained apron draped over her wide hips. Arlo leaned down, and she kissed his cheek. He gave her a big hug. Rachel stepped forward and held her as well.

“I never know your schedule, so I made food that we could eat – anytime, no rush.” She called over her shoulder. “Bert, they’re here!”

Rachel’s father had a habit of appearing around corners as if he had been beamed in. Arlo was aware of this, and so did not crash into him. Bert shook Arlo’s hand warmly, then reached around him and hugged his daughter.

“Traffic all right?” he asked.

Rachel shrugged. “Nothing too bad, nothing we can’t handle.”

“Well, mother is the proud possessor of a brand-new crockpot, so we all get to see what wonderful meal she has for us today! Come in, sit down – Arlo, you want a beer?”

Arlo only broke his ‘no carbs’ rule in this house. “Yes, thank you!”

“So – how are things at the zoo?” asked Bert, handing him a bottle.

“Pretty good, thanks. How are things at the factory?”

Bert stretched his lips backwards, baring his teeth. “Things are bad, not gonna lie.”

“How come? What’s up?”

“We can’t get anything,” said Bert simply, taking a swig of beer. “We’re doing all this ‘just in time’ manufacturing – we reach for a part, and it’s supposed to just – get handed to us. We don’t store anything – saves a fortune, but it means that if we reach for something, and it’s not there, we’ve got nothing! Empty factory. I’m going over things with Randall, the boss, and he’s pulling out what little hair he has left!”

“Why can’t you get anything?”

Bert shrugged. “Eh, that’s above my pay grade. It’s just like this – what was the name, the phrase in that article we read, hon?”

Bustling in the kitchen, Ethel threw a look over her shoulder. “Can you narrow it down a little, dear?”

“About how everything is just – slowing down…” He snapped his fingers. “The Great Slowdown, that’s it… Good article, I’ll give it to you. World is increasingly full of – heck, I don’t even know the word to use anymore. People who are slightly less – rapid, you know, upstairs.” He tapped his temple. “It’s like our new employees – they show up – well, when they show up – and you have to tell them the same thing three times – and even then, it’s only 50-50 they get it right. They think working is some kind of – option, like they’re doing you a big favour by showing up and pushing a broom.” He sighed, leading them into the living room. “When I was a kid, you worked – that’s just what you did. I got my first job when I was eleven. How are they supposed to put food on the table? I don’t know…”

Arlo sat down in a wide tartan easy chair. “We get these kids at the zoo – hah, listen to me, in my twenties, talking about ‘kids’ – but they come in without any sense of – I don’t know, urgency or need. Some are good, mostly immigrants – but most of them are just – totally lazy. They think life is like a conveyor belt that just brings you good things, no matter what. I didn’t start as early as you, Mr. Hastings, but I’ve had a job since I was in my mid-teens.”

Ethel came in with a plateful of crackers and cheese. “It’s the phone that’s driving me crazy these days. My ear hurts half the day because I’ve got the phone jammed against it for hours. And my neck, my shoulder… I know, Rachel, I should use the speakerphone - radiation, yeah – but I can't hear people, it’s too tinny. And no one has any answers, and no one calls you back – and I don’t mean to complain about accents, but it’s so hard to understand people sometimes…”

“I think we’re going to have to shut down,” said Bert abruptly. “I haven’t missed a day of work in – what, ten years? I think… But we can’t – Randall can’t afford to pay people to just – stand around. What did I always say, Rachel, about getting things done?”

Rachel smiled. “‘Do it, or tell me you won’t.’”

He grinned, snapping his fingers and pointing at her. “Exactly! These chuckleheads won’t deliver, and won’t warn me – and act all offended when I chew them out! And I'd be fine getting another job, I really would, but it feels like everything is the same at the moment. Like some zombie movie…”

Arlo nodded. “They had to operate on one of the lemurs, but they couldn’t. Do you know why?”

“Because it’s a lemur?” asked Rachel.

He shot her a slightly annoyed look. “No, because they couldn’t get any lidocaine. Please, please take care of your teeth everyone. My dentists said the same thing.”

Ethel rubbed her hands. “Even getting aspirin is a bother…”

Bert took a swig of beer. “My dad talked about the war – the big one, the second – and if he were still around, he’d think it was pretty damn – familiar. You remember, hon, that time he showed us his ration book?”

“Gave me the chills!” smiled Ethel, patting her thick belly. “I do like to stay warm!”

Arlo said: “I remember, when I was a kid – you’d remember it better than me – when it was supposed to be the ‘end of history’? Remember that?”

Ethel shook her head.

Bert nodded slowly. “I do…”

“We’d won. Democracy, free markets. It was all supposed to be…” Arlo gestured vaguely. “…trending upwards from there.”

“Like the space shuttle,” said Bert, turning to his wife. “Remember when we first saw it take off, and I said I wanted to save up for a ticket!” He whistled. “Whoo, did I hear about that one!”

“You stay safe for the people who love you!” said Ethel simply.

“Ah, that reminds me. Did you call that insurance broker, young lady?”

Rachel nodded. “I left a message.”

“When?”

“Couple of days ago.”

Bert tsked between his teeth. “Are you being straight with me?”

Rachel’s cheeks colored. “Yeah, why?”

“Because Harold is a good friend of mine, and I told him all about you and – Arlo. And he would never in a million years wait a couple of days before calling you back.” Bert raised a warning finger. “If he did, he and I are going to have words.”

Rachel cocked her head. “I called the number you gave me.”

“And you got the right voicemail?”

“Oh, dad – no one has time for voicemail! I always just – bypass it and leave a message…”

“And you didn’t think it strange that he didn’t call you back?”

“I don’t think it strange when…” Rachel laughed. “I think it strange when anyone calls me back.”

Ethel said: “Well, I’m glad it’s not just old broads like me…”

“You guys need life insurance,” said Bert, leaning forward. “Anything can happen. Anything. My buddy Edwin - you know that story?”

Everyone nodded.

“No insurance. Three kids. The man died with two months savings in his bank account. His wife had to go to work, his kids had to go to daycare… Now I know that your jobs are not as dangerous – but even in the car, accidents happen, every day… Please, for my peace of mind, talk to Harold.”

“Daycare…” murmured Rachel.

There was silence for a moment.

“Mom?”

“Mmm?”

“I was talking with Cassie the other day – and she reminded me of something. You stayed home with her, but I was in – daycare, right?”

A slight pause. “Yes…”

“What happened? Why?”

It is always amazing how quickly old wounds erupt.

Ethel frowned. “Well, that’s digging up some old news!”

“I’m just curious.”

“Why?”

Rachel swallowed, her mouth obviously dry. “I’m not sure…”

Ethel’s eyes widened suddenly, and she gestured at her belly again. “Are you..?”

“Oh, mom, no!”

“Well, it’s not a curse!

“I know that, but I’m not – pregnant.”

Bert laughed suddenly, too loudly. “You thinking of putting Arlo into daycare?”

Arlo smiled, but thinly.

Ethel stood up as rapidly as her knees permitted. “Who’s hungry?”

This was the moment of the power play – the topic dropped conspicuously, like a shattering plate everyone was expected to just – step over.

“It’s – Ben,” said Rachel.

Ethel froze.

Bert’s eyes narrowed. “Is he okay?”

“Not – not particularly,” said Rachel.

“What? Why?”

Rachel took a deep breath. “Ian’s going to… He’s convinced Cassie to quit work and stay home with the new baby. And they’re pulling Ben out of daycare.”

“Oh, that’s quite a thing!” said Bert. “We were never sicker than when you were first in daycare. You brought every bug and its cousin home!”

Rachel’s voice was tense. “It’s not because of – bugs, dad. Ben’s kind of freaking out at daycare.”

Her mother turned. “Freaking – out?”

“I think – acting out is the right term… Not listening, not sharing. Fighting, hitting. Biting. And – I think his language skills should be – further along.”

“What does – what does daycare have to do with that?”

“Well, Ian sent me a bunch of links, and – and there are some studies…”

Ethel frowned deeply. “Oh, studies! If there’s one thing the last couple of years have taught us…”

“We’re not talking about that, were talking about Ben!

Bert held up his hand and leaned forward again. “Wait – you’re saying that Cass and Ian think that daycare is – not good for Ben?”

“They’re need to try – something… Cass says he’s becoming – quite the terror.”

“Oh, that’s just the age!” snapped Ethel.

Her husband stared at her.

“What?” she demanded.

Bert turned to Rachel. “Your mother did… She did work, when you were little. A baby. She read all these magazines… It was expected, I guess…”

“Oh Bert, stop it!”

“Stop what?”

“You know.”

“I don’t.”

“The food is – well it’s not getting cold, but it’s better when it’s fresh. Come on, let’s go eat!”

Ethel reached forward and pulled at her husband’s arm.

He sighed and started to get up.

Rachel felt a thunderous charge of horses in her chest, pulling her towards the past, towards – what? Truth? Revelation?

There was no way to know.

“Wait!” she cried passionately.

Arlo turned to her in shock.

“Babe? You okay?”

Rachel leaned over and took her father’s other arm.

“Dad, I want to ask you something – it’s nothing about daycare, or anything like that…”

He looked at her quizzically. “You can ask me anything, you know that…”

Ethel sighed and sat back down. “I guess the food can wait,” she said with vague bitterness.

Rachel’s hands were trembling, and she closed them on her lap. “I’ve been – working on this – article about something called ‘men’s rights.’ It doesn’t matter, the content is unimportant – but this man I interviewed – sorry Arlo, I never mentioned it – he asked me something that I’ve been thinking about – a lot. To do with you, dad…”

Me?” Bert’s surprise was almost comical.

“Well…” Rachel gestured at her mother. “We all know how always thank mom for her cooking – and you’re going to thank God for your food – and even the farmers. Anyway, this man…” Rachel laughed rapidly. “He thinks that…”

Arlo said: “You want some water?”

Rachel shook her head and wiped her left eye suddenly. “Dad, I’m not much of a morning person, never was of course – but I remember waking up and hearing you getting ready in the dark – to go to work… You just said you haven’t taken a day off in over 10 years…”

Bert’s eyes were deeply alert. “No, I said I haven’t missed a day of work…”

“What was your longest vacation, dad?”

Bert frowned and glanced at his wife. “New Jersey?”

“No, Orlando. Ten days. Twelve years ago.”

Bert smiled. “What she said…”

Arlo whistled. “Mr. Hastings, you’re like a machine!”

The old man shrugged and smiled. “It’s my generation. It’s our way…”

Rachel said: “And I remember – I remember you always telling me to thank mom, show appreciation, and – praise her. You used to say: ‘It’s like mother’s milk to her’… Always thought that was – funny.”

Ethel raised an eyebrow. “Really? All these years, all these compliments – just – fake?”

Rachel shook her head rapidly. “Dad – this man wanted me to ask you something…”

Her father’s eyes were dark pools of expectation.

Ethel laughed suddenly. “Well, this is all very mysterious! Have you been keeping a mistress, my dear?”

“Yeah – under the couch. She helps me with my train set in the wee hours. In a bikini.”

Rachel shook her head again, as if to clear water from her ears. “Dad – I know it’s your generation, this emotional talk is like – it gives you hives, I think. But – Dad – did you feel – appreciated, for all the work, all the money, getting up in the dark…”

“Appreciated…” echoed her father mechanically. There was no emotion in his voice.

“Well, we thank mom all the time… ‘Mother’s milk.’ I’m – I’m ashamed… It’s so stupid! I saw a documentary the other day about a band, and the bassist wrote all the great songs, and the drummer – well the band broke up, right at the height of their fame, and the drummer – years later – said that he never thanked the bassist for all of the great songs that made them famous… I’m sorry, this is…” Rachel fixed her eyes on her father’s very still face. “I don’t remember a single time when I thanked you for getting up in the dark, for going to work… For paying all the bills.”

“Your father wasn’t the only one who worked in this family!” snapped Ethel.

Her eyes full, Rachel turned to her mother. “I know, mom,” she said softly. “But you got thanked, you were appreciated – we all – we all made sure of that… It’s almost like we – had to – I’m not saying that you demanded it, or anything like that, but…”

Rachel trailed off.

She looked at Arlo, who was staring at her father.

Bert’s eyes were narrowed. His face lowered slightly, his cheeks darkening.

“Don’t upset your father!” cried Ethel automatically.

Bert spoke with some effort. “Your – your health and happiness was all the thanks I needed… You and Cassie… And mom…”

“But why?” asked Rachel. “Mom’s not a child – if she needs appreciation, why don’t you?”

Bert shook his head in a daze.

“That time you burned your hand on the printing press… That must’ve hurt like – like heck. And when you had that manager, the bald guy with the beard, the screamer – what was his name?”

“Oh… Wesley…” murmured Bert, his eyes full of pain.

“I mean – that went on for years…”

“Three and a half years…” murmured her father. “I could give you that in minutes, if you have a mind.”

“And you couldn’t quit…”

Her father shrugged. “It was a recession…”

Rachel took a deep breath. “Well… Dad, I’m not saying you need it, but I’m really sorry that I never said anything.”

There was a moment of silence. Arlo was staring at Rachel. Ethel stood up again.

“Well, now that that’s…”

“Mom!” cried Rachel. “Haven’t you thanked him?”

Ethel’s eyes seemed to freeze over. “My relationship with your father is our business!”

Arlo suddenly said: “You haven’t thanked me!”

Rachel opened her mouth, and her face froze.

Bert said: “For the zoo?”

“Hey, I make a good base, and great tips! I give kids a great show! I know you shouldn’t talk money with – family – but I made one heck of a lot more than Rachel did last year!”

Ethel said, uncertainly: “That’s – good…”

Bert widened his eyes and cocked his head. “To be honest, we always wondered…”

Arlo pursed his lips. “Well, Rachel is trying to get her career going, and there’s not a mess of jobs out there for me, so I've been – hanging in… To be supportive. I think she’s a great writer… But I think you – I think you look down on me for that, Rach.”

“We should leave you two alone,” said Ethel decisively.

There was a pause. No one moved.

Rachel’s hands were on her clavicle. “My God, my chest is… Sorry. Why can’t I get these words out?”

“What – words?” asked her father slowly.

Rachel burst into tears. “Dad, you worked so hard for us – you still do… I’m pushing thirty, you shouldn’t be reminding me about life insurance! I don’t think I made that call – I’m sorry, I don’t want to make that call, because I’m not sure what kind of life we have…” Making a tight fist, Rachel thumped herself hard on the forehead. “Damn it, stop making it about yourself!” She raised her eyes to her father’s waiting face.

“Dad, I’m so… I thank you for – so much. You are a great father… I know you would rather have been home with us – you always told us how much fun we were…” Rachel held up a warning hand as her mother started to speak. “I’m not saying you didn’t work mom – God, can we just make it about dad for five minutes? Dad, I know you didn’t like your job. I know you saved up money so that – so that me and Cass could get an education. And I know you’re a smart guy, you could’ve done – better than me, I think. And I know you really disliked – hated – some of that stuff you had to print at the factory. It was pretty – degenerate, I heard you and mom talking about it a couple of times… And that screamer, he was a – real pill… And you did it – you did it all for us, and we just – swallowed it up… Mom, this is not about you! And here you are, surrounded by three women, who take all your money and don’t even give you the time of day! God, it’s wretched! Thank you, dad, thank you, thank you, thank you!”

His eyes full of tears, Bert leaned forward and embraced his daughter.

Ethel glared, then leaned forward and stroked Rachel’s hair.

Arlo leaned back, pouting ever so slightly.

 

Next chapters: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/3493810/the-present

community logo
Join the Freedomain Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
3
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
SHARE PEACEFUL PARENTING!

All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!

THANK YOU SO MUCH!

https://www.freedomain.com/donate

00:01:00
Jesus vs Secular Ethics!

Stefan Molyneux takes on objections to Universally Preferable Behavior as a moral framework. He pushes back against the idea that morality stands on its own, stressing the need for clear definitions in any philosophical talk. When it comes to tying morality to gods or divine sources, he points out that fuzzy claims don't hold up as real arguments. Molyneux questions whether morality can just be about chasing the good, the true, and the beautiful, pulling in examples from religious texts to show the inconsistencies there. He looks back at how Christian morality has fallen short over time and doubts whether theocratic setups really deliver on ethics. In the end, he calls for a straightforward grasp of morality and what UPB means in practice, urging people to check their own biases and lean on real-world evidence in these discussions.

Email from listener:

UPB reduces down to "Morality is being". Or "By the act of living, you prefer life". Or Universal Preference for Being. But even without beings, morality still exists. So morality ...

00:35:54
The Shooting of Jeffrey Pretti

Stefan Molyneux examines the shooting of intensive care nurse Alex Jeffrey Pretti in Minneapolis on January 24, 2026, which occurred during protests over immigration enforcement. He looks into how Pretti started out as an observer but ended up in a deadly clash with U.S. Border Patrol agents, and he discusses the problems that arise when civilians step into law enforcement matters. Drawing on public accounts alongside expert opinions, he underscores the hazards of disrupting police work and stresses the need to consider personal accountability in volatile settings.

0:00:00 Introduction
0:00:31 Eyewitness Accounts and Controversy
0:01:49 Standard Use of Force Doctrine
0:03:45 Legal Escalation and Physical Confrontation
0:06:13 Broader Issues in Civilian Interference
0:07:16 Training and Situational Awareness
0:08:56 Understanding Perceived Threats
0:10:28 The Stakes of Law Enforcement Confrontations
0:11:05 Final Thoughts and Reflections

GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! https://shop.freedomain.com/

...

00:11:40
How does this X Spaces show sound?

How does this X Spaces show sound?

How does this X Spaces show sound?
A chapter from my new novel...

I'm trying a different style of writing, let me know what you think!

A chapter from my new novel...
Today's X Space...

I had to merge two files, can you tell me if there is any significant overlap?

Thanks!

Today's X Space...
NEW PREMIUM CONTENT - Faith in Humanity?

Sunday Morning Live 25 January 2026

Preview at the Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/9584420e/faith-in-humanity

Subscribers can access this content at:

X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux/status/2016279145043665140

Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/post/7640116/faith-in-humanity

Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/posts/2312571

Freedomain: https://freedomain.com/faith-in-humanity/

Not yet a subscriber?

You can subscribe on:

X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux

Locals: https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025

Subscribestar: https://subscribestar.com/freedomain

Freedomain: https://fdrurl.com/members

Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!

You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release ...

post photo preview

Stef & community, which books/articles/resources do you recommend as helpful for peaceful parenting (particularly toddlers)?

I’m reading the condensed version of Peaceful Parenting, and while it has a lot of heavy hitting arguments, I’m not finding dreadfully many practical tips and tools to actually apply it. As an exhausted toddler mama I would be VERY appreciative of recommendations!

Also, is listening through the Peaceful Parenting Podcast still mostly relevant or did Stef change his mind on too much stuff later on (like Montessori and Unparenting)?

Thanks if you take the time to answer!

SUNDAY MORNING LIVE FOR SUBSCRIBERS WITH STEFAN MOLYNEUX 10am EST - STARTING NOW!

Subscribers, let's talk philosophy!

Join the stream on Locals: https://fdrurl.com/locals-live

Not yet a subscriber?

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows!

You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!

See you soon!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2025

post photo preview
post photo preview
Freedomain Premium Content!
In the vast tapestry of human experience, this collection of premium content stands as a beacon of reflection and introspection! Each episode is a journey into the complexities of our shared existence. From the intricate dance of self-forgiveness to the harrowing tales of personal adversity, these moments of life challenge, provoke, and inspire.


If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
THE GREATEST ESSAY IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY

Humanity evolves through accumulated wisdom from endless trial and error. This wisdom has been transmitted through fiction – stories, superstitions, commandments, and ancestor-worship – which has created the considerable problem that these fictions can be easily intercepted and replaced by other lies. 

Children absorb their moral and cultural wisdom from parents, priests and teachers. When governments take over education, foreign thoughts easily transmit themselves to the young, displacing parents and priests. In a fast-changing world, parents represent the past, and are easily displaced by propaganda. 

Government education thus facilitates cultural takeovers – a soft invasion that displaces existing thought-patterns and destroys all prior values. 

The strength of intergenerational cultural transmission of values only exists when authority is exercised by elders. When that authority transfers to the State, children adapt to the new leaders, scorning their parents in the process. 

This is an evolutionary adaptation that resulted from the constant brutal takeovers of human history and prehistory. If your tribe was conquered, you had to adapt to the values of your new masters or risk genetic death through murder or ostracism. 

When a new overlord – who represents the future – inflicts his values on the young, they scorn their parents and cleave to the new ruler in order to survive. 

Government instruction of the young is thus the portal through which alien ideas conquer the young as if a violent overthrow had occurred – which in fact it did, since government education is funded through force. 

This is the weakness of the cultural transmission of values – by using ‘authority’ instead of philosophy – reason and evidence – new authorities can easily displace the accumulated wisdom of thousands of years. 

It is a common observation that a culture’s success breeds its own destruction. Cultures that follow more objective reason tend to prosper – this prosperity breeds resentment and greed in the hearts of less-successful people and cultures, who then swarm into the wealthier lands and use the State to drain them dry of their resources. 

Everything that has been painfully learned and transmitted over a thousand generations can be scattered to the winds in a mere generation or two. 

This happens less in the realms of reason and mathematics, for obvious reasons. Two and two make four throughout all time, in all places, regardless of propaganda. The Pythagorean theorem is as true now as it was thousands of years ago – Aristotle’s three laws of logic remain absolute and incontrovertible to all but the most deranged. 

Science – absent the corrupting influence of government funding – remains true and absolute across time and space. Biological absolutes can only be opposed by those about to commit suicide. 

Authority based on lies hates the clarity and objectivity – and curiosity – of rational philosophy. Bowing to the authority of reason means abandoning the lies that prop up the powerful – but refusing to bow to reason means you end up bowing to foreigners who take over your society via the centralized indoctrination of the young. 

Why is this inevitable? 

Because it is an addiction. 

Political power is the most powerful – and dangerous – addiction. The drug addict only destroys his own life, and harms those close to him. The addiction to political power harms hundreds of millions of people – but the political junkies don’t care, they have dehumanized their fellow citizens – in order to rule over others, you must first view them as mere useful livestock instead of sovereign minds like your own. 

Just as drug addicts would rather destroy lives than stop using – political addicts would rather be slaves in their own sick system than free in a rational, moral world. 

If we cannot find a way to transmit morals without lies or assumptions, we will never break the self-destructive cycle of civilization – success breeds unequal wealth, which breeds resentment and greed, which breeds stealing from the successful through political power, which collapses the society. 

If we cannot anchor morals in reason and evidence, we can never build a successful civilization that does not engineer its own demise. Everything good that mankind builds will forever be dismantled using the same tools that were used to build it. 

Since the fall of religion in the West – inevitable given the wild successes of the free market and modern science and medicinewhich came out of skepticism, reason and the Enlightenment – we have applied critical reasoning to every sphere except morality. We have spun spaceships out of the solar system, plumbed the depths of the atom and cast our minds back to the very nanoseconds after our universe came into being – but we cannot yet clearly state why murder, rape, theft and assault are wrong. 

We can say that they are “wrong” because they feel bad, or are harmful to social cohesion, or because God commands it, or because they are against the law – but that does not help us understand what morality is, or how it is proven. 

Saying that rape is wrong because it feels bad to the victim does not answer why rape is wrong. Clearly it feels ‘good’ to the rapist – otherwise rape would not exist. 

Saying it harms social happiness or cohesion is a category error, since ‘society’ does not exist empirically. Individuals act in their own perceived self-interest. From an evolutionary perspective, ‘rape’ is common. The amoral genes of an ugly man that no woman wants are rewarded for rape, since it gives them at least some chance to survive. 

Saying that rape is wrong because God commands it does not answer the question – it is an appeal to an unreasoning authority that cannot be directly questioned. 

Saying that rape is wrong because it is illegal is begging the question. Many evil things throughout history have been legal, and many good things – such as free speech and absolute private property – are currently criminalized. 

Saying that rape is wrong because it makes the victim unhappy is not a moral argument – it is a strange argument from hedonism, in that the ‘morality’ of an action is measured only by pleasure and painWe often inflict significant misery on people in order to heal or educate them. We punish children – often harshly. The ‘hedonism’ argument is also used to justify sacrificing free speech on the altar of self-proclaimed ‘offense’ and ‘upset.’ 

So… 

Why is rape wrong? 

Why are murder, theft and assault immoral? 

A central tenet of modernity has been the confirmation of personal experience through universal laws that end up utterly blowing our minds. 

The theory of gravity affirms our immediate experience of weight and balance and throwing and catching – and also that we are standing on giant spinning ball rocketing around a star that is itself rocketing around a galaxy. We feel still; we are in fact in blinding motion. The sun and the moon appear to be the same size – they are in fact vastly different. It looks like the stars go round the Earth, but they don’t 

Science confirms our most immediate experiences, while blowing our minds about the universe as a whole. 

If you expand your local observations – “everything I drop falls” – to the universal – “everything in the universe falls” – you radically rewrite your entire world-view. 

If you take the speed of light as constant, your perception of time and space change forever – and you also unlock the power of the atom, for better and for worse. 

If you take the principles of selective breeding and animal husbandry and apply them to life for the last four billion years, you get the theory of evolution, and your world-view is forever changed – for the better, but the transition is dizzying. 

If we take our most common moral instincts – that rape, theft, assault and murder are wrong – and truly universalize them, our world-view also changes forever – better, more accuratemore moral – but also deeply disturbing, disorienting and dizzying. 

But we cannot universalize what we cannot prove – this would just be the attempt to turn personal preferences into universal rules: “I like blue, therefore blue is universally preferable.” 

No, we must first prove morality – only then can we universalize it. 

To prove morality, we must first accept that anything that is impossible cannot also be true. 

It cannot be true that a man can walk north and south at the same time. 

It cannot be true that a ball can fall up and down at the same time. 

It cannot be true that gases both expand and contract when heated. 

It cannot be true that water both boils and freezes at the same temperature. 

It cannot be true that 2 plus 2 equals both 4 and 5. 

If all men are mortal, and Socrates is a man, then it cannot be true that Socrates is immortal. 

If you say that impossible things can be true, then you are saying that you have a standard of truth that includes both truth and the opposite of truth, which is itself impossible. 

The impossible is the opposite of the possible – if you say that both the possible and the impossible can be true, then you are saying that your standard for truth has two opposite standards, which cannot be valid. This would be like saying that the proof of a scientific theory is conformity with reason and evidence, and also the opposite of conformity with reason and evidence, or that profit in a company equals both making money, and losing money. 

All morality is universally preferable behaviourin that it categorizes behaviour that should ideally be chosen or avoided by all people, at all timesWe do not say that rape is evil only on Wednesdays, or 1° north of the equator, or only by tall people. Rape is always and forever wrong – we understand this instinctively, though it is a challenge to prove it rationally. 

Remember, that which is impossible can never be true. 

If we put forward the proposition that “rape is universally preferable behaviour,” can that ever be true? 

If it is impossible, it can never be true. 

If we logically analyse the proposition that “rape is universally preferable behaviour,” we quickly find that it is impossible. 

The statement demands that everyone prefers rape – to rape and be raped at all times, and under all circumstances. 

Aside from the logistical challenges of both raping and being raped at the same time, the entire proposition immediately contradicts itself. Since it is self-contradictory, it is impossible, and if it is impossible, it can neither be true nor valid. 

If “rape is universally preferable behaviour,” then everyone must want to rape and be raped at all times. 

However, rape is by definition violently unwanted sexual behaviour. 

In other words, it is only “rape” because it is decidedly not preferred. 

Since the category “rape” only exists because one person wants it, while the other person – his or her victim – desperately does not want itrape cannot be universally preferable. 

No behaviour that only exists because one person wants it, and the other person does not, can ever be in the category of “universally preferable.” 

Therefore, it is impossible that rape is universally preferable behaviour. 

What about the opposite? Not raping? 

Can “not raping” logically ever be “universally preferable behaviour”? 

In other words, are there innate self-contradictions in the statement “not raping is universally preferable behaviour”? 

No. 

Everyone on the planet can simultaneously “not rape” without logical self-contradiction. Two neighbours can both be gardening at the same time – which is “not raping” – without self-contradiction. All of humanity can operate under the “don’t rape” rule without any logical contradictions whatsoever. 

Therefore, when we say that “rape is wrong,” we mean this in a dual sense – rape is morally wrong, and it is morally wrong because any attempt to make rape “moral” – i.e. universally preferable behaviour – creates immediate self-contradictions, and therefore is impossible, and therefore cannot be correct or valid. 

It is both morally and logically wrong. 

What about assault? 

Well, assault occurs when one person violently attacks another person who does not want the attack to occur. (This does not apply to sports such as boxing or wrestling where aggressive attacks are agreed to beforehand.) 

This follows the same asymmetry as rape. 

Assault can never be universally preferable behaviour, because if it were, everyone must want to assault and be assaulted at all times and under all circumstances. 

However, if you want to be assaulted, then it is not assault. 

Boom. 

What about theft? 

Well, theft is the unwanted transfer of property. 

To say that theft is universally preferable behaviour is to argue that everyone must want to steal and be stolen from at all times, and under all circumstances. 

However, if you want to be stolen from, it is not theft – the category completely disappears when it is universalized. 

If I want you to take my property, you are not stealing from me. 

If I put a couch by the side of the road with a sign saying “TAKE ME,” I cannot call you a thief for taking the couch. 

Theft cannot be universally preferable behaviour because again, it is asymmetrical, in that it is wanted by one party – the thief – but desperately not wanted by the other party – the person stolen from. 

If a category only exists because one person wants it, but the other person doesn’t, it cannot fall under the category of “universally preferable behaviour.” 

The same goes for murder. 

Murder is the unwanted killing of another. 

If someone wants to be killed, this would fall under the category of euthanasia, which is different from murder, which is decidedly unwanted. 

In this way, rape, theft, assault and murder can never be universally preferable behaviours. 

The nonaggression principle and a respect for property rights fully conform to rational morality, in that they can be universalized with perfect consistency. 

There is no contradiction in the proposal that everyone should respect persons and property at all times. To not initiate the use of force, and to not steal, are both perfectly logically consistent. 

Of course, morality exists because people want to do evil – we do not live in heaven, at least not yet. 

Universally preferable behaviour is a method of evaluating moral propositions which entirely accepts that some people want to do evil. 

The reason why it is so essential is because the greatest evils in the world are done not by violent or greedy individuals, but rather by false moral systems such as fascism, communism, socialism and so on. 

In the 20th century alone, governments murdered 250 million of their own citizens – outside of war, just slaughtering them in the streets, in gulags and concentration camps. 

Individual murderers can at worst kill only a few dozen people in their lifetime, and such serial killers are extraordinarily rare. 

Compare this to the toll of war. 

A thief may steal your car, but it takes a government to have you born into millions of dollars of intergenerational debt and unfunded liabilities. 

Now, remember when I told you that when we universalize your individual experience, we end up with great and dizzying truths? 

Get ready. 

What is theft? 

The unwanted transfer of property, usually through the threat of force. 

What is the national debt? 

The unwanted transfer of property, through the threat of force. 

Individuals in governments have run up incomprehensible debts to be paid by the next generations – the ultimate example of “taxation without representation.” 

The concept of “government” is a moral theory, just like “slavery” and “theocracy” and “honour killings.” 

The theory is that some individuals must initiate the use of force, while other individuals are banned from initiating the use of force. 

Those within the “government” are defined by their moral and legal rights to initiate the use of force, while those outside the “government” are defined by moral and legal bans on initiating the use of force. 

This is an entirely contradictory moral theory. 

If initiating the use of force is wrong, then it is wrong for everyone, since morality is universally preferable behaviour. 

If all men are mortal, we cannot say that Socrates is both a man and immortal. 

If initiating force is universally wrong, we cannot say that it is wrong for some people, but right for others. 

“Government” is a moral theory that is entirely self-contradictory – and that which is self-contradictory is impossible – as we accepted earlier – and thus cannot be valid. 

If a biologist creates a category called “mammal” which is defined by being warm-blooded,” is it valid to include cold-blooded creatures in that category? 

Of course not. 

If a physicist proposes a rule that all matter has the property of gravity, can he also say that obsidian has the property of antigravity? 

Of course not. 

If all matter has gravity, and obsidian is composed of matter, then obsidian must have gravity. 

If we say that morality applies to all humanscan we create a separate category of humans for which the opposite of morality applies? 

Of course not. 

I mean, we can do whatever we want, but it’s neither true nor moral. 

If we look at something like counterfeiting, we understand that counterfeiting is the creation of pretend currency based on no underlying value or limitation. 

Counterfeiting is illegal for private citizens, but legal – and indeed encouraged – for those protected by the government. 

Thus, by the moral theory of “government,” that which is evil for one person, is virtuous for another. 

No. 

False. 

That which is self-contradictory cannot stand. 

People who live by ignoring obvious self-contradictions are generally called insane. 

They cannot succeed for long in this life. 

Societies that live by ignoring obvious self-contradictions are also insane, although we generally call them degenerate, decadent, declining and corrupt. 

Such societies cannot succeed for long in this world. 

The only real power – the essence of political power – is to create opposite moral categories for power-mongers. 

What is evil for you is good for them. 

It is disorienting to take our personal morals and truly universalize them. 

So what? 

Do you think we have reached the perfect end of our moral journey as a species? 

Is there nothing left to improve upon when it comes to virtue? 

Every evil person creates opposite standards for themselves – the thief says that he can steal, but others should not, because he doesn’t like to be stolen from! 

Politicians say that they must use violence, but citizens must not. 

Nothing that is self-contradictory can last for long. 

You think we have finished our moral journey? 

Of course not. 

Shake off your stupor, wake up to the corruption all around and within you. 

Like “government,” slavery was a universal morally-justified ethic for almost all of human history. 

Until it wasn’t. 

Read full Article
Essay Feedback Requested!

Good evening, my wonderful donors! I'd appreciate if you could take the time to read this essay and give me your feedback!

Thanks so much!!

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals