If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Freedomain
Hi there, this is Stefan Molyneux - welcome to Freedomain, the Locals community! One of the last homes for real philosophy in the world!
Feel free to have a look around, chat with other members, share your thoughts, objections, arguments and memes!
This is a place where we strive to achieve the truth through consistent virtue - a great playground for innovative ideas and interactions!
Feel free to have a look around, chat with other members, share your thoughts, objections, arguments and memes!
This is a place where we strive to achieve the truth through consistent virtue - a great playground for innovative ideas and interactions!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Stefan Molyneux@freedomain
September 25, 2023
When Loving the World Drives You Mad!
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Get access to StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, my new book and the History of Philosophers series!
See you soon!
https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022
I really appreciate your philosophical definition of “love”, but find that I’m left with a blank space in my brain trying to describe so many relationships now. I know people who choose to not strive toward virtue but for whom I still have affection. I can’t “love” them, but I wish them well and are rooting for them to choose better and be happy. I agree with you about how profoundly language matters, and this is a something I’m stuck on. Is there perhaps a Greek word to describe this? “Agape” maybe?
Is there a philosophical basis for the modern phenomenon of being called out for “mansplaining?”
ARTICLES:
"Men score higher on financial knowledge than women, but why?"
"Men score somewhat higher than women on the science knowledge scale overall"
"Women living in the world's most advanced democracies and under the most progressive gender equality regimes still know less about politics than men. Indeed, an unmistakable gender gap in political knowledge seems to be a global phenomenon, according to a ten-nation study of media systems and national political knowledge funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)."
I've been thinking a lot lately about how much I should love people. I don't mean people I know; I treat people I meet as well as I can the first time I meet them and then treat them either as well as they treat me, or as well as I have to treat them for utilitarian reasons, whichever is better. But my question pertains to humanity in the abstract. I am coming to terms with the fact that I do not love people, do not love humanity (hesitant to say "I hate people" but that's kinda the thought).
I've been trying to devote my life to caring for others and helping to make the world better for people, but I'm starting to think pretty seriously about abandoning ship before it sinks, which means abandoning the people I casually interact with, the children whose lives I'm improving, and in a sense abandoning my efforts to improve the world to just save myself. How do I know when it's time to release everyone else to their possibly horrific fate, including all these young people who are not responsible for what's coming to them? My heart breaks for these young people even while my view of the adults around them hardens in me that they deserve what's coming to them; American leftists deserve the dictatorship they're building for themselves, and American conservatives deserve to lose because they just won't understand the origins of totalitarianism in child abuse and their own errors and hubris.
Imagine you're creating a family motto for your coat of arms (armorial achievement); what are those words you choose to live by? 🛡️
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
SHARE PEACEFUL PARENTING!
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
00:01:00
How NOT to be Bitchy! Twitter/X Space
In this flash 20th October 2025 X Space, s explores technology's impact on science and society, using touchscreen frustrations as a metaphor for our quest for clarity. Highlighting skepticism and acceptance in scientific inquiry, inspired by Richard Feynman, they emphasize the importance of rigorous testing. The session culminates in a discussion on truth and encourages attendees to challenge assumptions, advocating for ongoing inquiry into knowledge and communication's role in our shared experience.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for ...
03:20:26
What Does "Forgive 70 Times 7" Mean?
This clip comes from "MY MOTHER MADE ME FAT!! Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6147
Understanding true forgiveness is key ✝️ It requires repentance. Let's not fall for the lie that forgiveness can be granted without repentance. The post being read: https://x.com/MarkWDouglas/status/1970348389339382256
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
00:01:42
The concept of Universal Consequentialism 😱
A year ago, I presented a different view of consequentialism in this community, which is to devide the concept into rational and irrational consequentialism.
Here's a different approach to explain what consequentialism actually is, based on an example Stefan is providing in his book "Peaceful Parenting", chapter 11, page 153, timestamp 38:19 in the audio book. Quote:
"Since you are all very clever readers, you will be replying to me in your mind something along the lines of this: 'Ah, you say, Mr. Philosopher, that no one can accurately predict the future, but you also state that hitting children has negative outcomes!'
That is certainly true – both that I make that claim, and that hitting children does have generally negative outcomes.
However, we do not judge the morality of hitting children based upon positive or negative outcomes.
For instance, we know that state control of the economy leads to massive inefficiencies – but we don't judge the morality of state control of ...
Learn how to reason with "The Art of the Argument"!
In "The Art of the Argument," philosopher and host of Freedomain Stefan Molyneux delivers a no-nonsense guide to mastering persuasive talk. Beyond winning debates, it's about sharp logic, emotional smarts, and ethical persuasion to elevate your communication game.
Molyneux breaks down building airtight arguments, exposing fallacies, and handling heated exchanges with wit and depth. Key insights include:
-
Argument basics: What works, what flops.
-
Socratic method: Questions that uncover truth.
-
Emotions in play: Harness them without losing ground.
-
Ethics: When to fight, when to fold—with integrity.
For debaters or anyone sharpening their voice, this book arms you with tools for real, transformative conversations. Rethink how you argue and persuade.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
Freedomain Premium Content!
In the vast tapestry of human experience, this collection of premium content stands as a beacon of reflection and introspection! Each episode is a journey into the complexities of our shared existence. From the intricate dance of self-forgiveness to the harrowing tales of personal adversity, these moments of life challenge, provoke, and inspire.
