If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Freedomain
Hi there, this is Stefan Molyneux - welcome to Freedomain, the Locals community! One of the last homes for real philosophy in the world!
Feel free to have a look around, chat with other members, share your thoughts, objections, arguments and memes!
This is a place where we strive to achieve the truth through consistent virtue - a great playground for innovative ideas and interactions!
Feel free to have a look around, chat with other members, share your thoughts, objections, arguments and memes!
This is a place where we strive to achieve the truth through consistent virtue - a great playground for innovative ideas and interactions!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Stefan Molyneux@freedomain
November 26, 2023
PEACEFUL PARENTING AND UPB - Locals Answers
UpB question: I may be mistaken on the tenets, but if the basis of UPB seems to be offenses against someone's wishes/boundaries (rape being not UPB because it is not possible for it to be consensual, thus always guaranteed to be against someone's wishes/guaranteed to be breaking their boundaries...), then why can something only be immoral if it's part of a category that has to be against someone's wishes?
What if someone does something intentionally sadistic, such as knowing someone's trigger and pushing against it, but that thing is not physical but, let's say, sonic (making a certain noise known to be distressing)? Or lies about someone, to be more general? Just because something can be, in your assessments, not a case of immorality in the Category, why does that mean that the whole category is now off the table to not be UPB?
Emotions have opposites: happy/sad, mad/calm, laughter/serious...
What is the opposite of temptation?
What are some great ways to teach children about evil and how to recognise it? How do you make it age appropriate?
What are your thoughts on the difference between an assertive tone vs a raised voice/yelling. The way my wife speaks to the children sounds sometimes like yelling, but to her it sounds confident and assertive. For example, my son was fooling around going down the stairs while I had my other son in my hands and she saw and spoke harshly to him saying "stop, turn around, go downstairs safely", and he cried. I think he just got scared and was in an already stressful situation going down stairs, but I also thought it sounded very close to yelling.
I have wondered how much my early childhood trauma of being yelled at a lot plays into my current interpretation of her voice, but even then the difference seems to me somewhat subtle. How can I objectively identify these two cases?
How do we stop ourselves becoming corrupt in this now corrupt world? This world and society reminds me of Batman: the dark knight rises.
As a person in my early 20s there was a time before the Internet and tech. Since your daughter is 14, did she have a pre internet and tech life? And how do you think parents should navigate this?
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
Get access to the audiobook for my new book 'Peaceful Parenting,' StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, and the 22 Part History of Philosophers series!
See you soon!
00:53:14
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
SHARE PEACEFUL PARENTING!
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
00:01:00
How to Save Your Marriage!
Stefan Molyneux digs into the challenges of romantic relationships, particularly how men and women interact. He pushes back against the idea that equality means being identical, pointing out that real differences shape what people can do and how they excel. Drawing from things like how siblings get along or gaps in pay, he stresses the need to appreciate what each person brings to the table. He also looks at how mismatched ways of talking can lead to confusion, and suggests embracing those differences instead of letting them cause friction. In the end, Molyneux calls for an approach to equality that respects personal traits as key to solid partnerships.
0:00:00 Relationships and Equality
0:02:37 The Illusion of Sameness
0:04:28 Athletic Abilities and Ethnic Differences
0:08:28 The Roadies of Life
0:11:51 Recognizing Unique Talents
0:15:24 The Cry of Unfairness
0:17:11 Embracing Differences in Relationships
0:18:37 Judging by Standards
0:23:56 Nature’s Design in Gender Roles
0:27:00 ...
00:36:13
Feminism! Ana vs Pearl!
Stefan Molyneux takes on a debate about feminism between Ana Kasparian and Pearl Davis in his Freedomain podcast. He discusses Pearl's arguments on women's roles in the economy, tying them to falling birth rates and broader effects on society. Molyneux breaks down some common misunderstandings in economic data and digs into the nuances of gender expectations and family life. In the end, he questions what modern feminism really means and encourages people to join the conversation.
Stefan will be there March 28, 2026, he hopes to see you there!
Find Word War Debate on X: https://x.com/WordWarDebate
0:00:00 Introduction to the Debate
0:01:10 Unpacking Feminism's Economic Impact
0:05:59 The Government's Role in Female Employment
0:14:17 Domestic Violence Statistics and Feminism
0:16:56 Title IX and Its Implications
0:23:08 The Debate on Modern Relationships
0:28:20 The Case of Terrence Pop
0:32:22 The Effects of Feminism on Men
0:41:01 The Statistics of Divorce
0:49:00 Child Support and Alimony ...
01:06:58
🚨 NEW MERCH DROP: FREEDOMAIN PHONE CASES! 🚨
Excited to announce our brand-new Freedomain branded phone cases! We carry options for iPhone and Samsung models. 📱💭
Show off your love for philosophy on the go while keeping your device safe and stylish.
Head over to the shop now: https://shop.freedomain.com/
While you're browsing, why not snag a coffee mug ☕ or a comfy hoodie 🧥 to complete your collection?
Don't delay!
The Myth of the 'Karen'
In this subscriber portion of Sunday Morning Live on the 11th of January, 2026, Stefan Molyneux delves into voting patterns and the "Karen" stereotype within politics. He looks at the longstanding friction between communism and white communities, considering its effects on job prospects for white men. In response to questions from listeners, he reviews how women appear in ads and what those images suggest about society. He questions stories in the media about encounters with police and touches on how social media shapes conversations. Toward the end, he shares thoughts on the cryptocurrency scene, focusing on Bitcoin, and talks about appreciation and connection while marking a milestone of his own.
Listen to the public portion of this livestream at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6260/the-shooting-of-renee-good
Premium Content Hub: https://premium.freedomain.com/4b6c61b3/the-myth-of-the-karen?accessCode=Freedomain2024
Audio: https://cdn.freedomain.com/FDRP/FDRP_myth_karen.mp3
Video: ...
Freedomain Premium Content!
In the vast tapestry of human experience, this collection of premium content stands as a beacon of reflection and introspection! Each episode is a journey into the complexities of our shared existence. From the intricate dance of self-forgiveness to the harrowing tales of personal adversity, these moments of life challenge, provoke, and inspire.
