Locals Questions Answered 7 Dec 2023

https://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDRP/FDR_locals_questions_7_dec_2023.mp3

Brief Summary
In this conversation, we discuss the challenges of engaging with immoral individuals and conclude that it's nearly impossible to win against them. We emphasize the importance of surrounding ourselves with people who respect conflict rules and advise against trying to understand the actions of "crazy people." We also touch on topics such as the addiction to travel, the significance of enforcing boundaries, and the drawbacks of prioritizing instant gratification. Overall, we stress the simplicity of moral concepts and the need for long-term happiness over short-term pleasures.

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Get my new series on the Truth About the French Revolution, access to the audiobook for my new book 'Peaceful Parenting,' StefBOT-AI, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and more! See you soon! 

https://freedomain.locals.com/support/promo/UPB2022

Chapters
0:00:00 The Impact of Crazy Mothers on Attracting Healthy Partners
0:10:09 The Importance of Engaging in Good Faith Debates
0:13:07 Possible Motives Behind Mother's Dislike of Ex-Wife
0:15:31 Exploring the Concept of "Cold Feet"
0:17:46 The Addiction to Travel and Lack of Pair-Bonding
0:20:10 Why Should Anyone Be Interested in You?
0:27:17 Boundaries Equals Death: Evolutionary Perspective on Enforcing Boundaries
0:28:27 The Fear of Enforcing Boundaries
0:34:49 Negative articles on Bitcoin controlled by powers that be.
0:37:48 The consequences of not having children and a family.
0:40:02 Memories of buying and selling computers and technological advancements.
0:43:25 Selfishness and Deferred Gratification
0:51:42 Morality: Simple and Universal
0:52:25 Explanation of Rational Proof of Secular Ethics

Long Summary
In this part of the conversation, the main speaker explores the idea of engaging with immoral people and concludes that winning against them is nearly impossible. They suggest that the best outcome one can hope for is a draw, where the immoral person's false sense of self remains intact. The main speaker emphasizes the importance of not engaging with people who do not adhere to the rules of a conflict and cautions against getting involved in debates or negotiations with such individuals. They believe that having people in one's life who respect these rules is essential for a healthy and sane life.

The main speaker suggests a theory about the listener's situation, stating that their mother recognized their ex-wife as a verbal abuser and wanted her out of their life. They advise not to delve too deep into understanding the actions of "crazy people" as it can be futile. The main speaker then discusses the concept of cold feet, explaining that it is a gut feeling or instinct signaling that something is wrong with a commitment. They argue that the term "cold feet" is used by exploiters to dismiss these instincts.

Moving on, the main speaker addresses the addiction to travel, suggesting that it can be a way to avoid deep connections with others. While there's nothing wrong with gaining vivid experiences through travel, it can often be a substitute for genuine intimacy and self-knowledge. The main speaker believes in shielding their child, Isi, from the harsh reality of human evil for as long as possible.

The main speaker shares their observation that people who are insecure about their value often seek validation and praise from others. They then discuss their own experience with their family of origin, where they tried to have open and honest conversations but were met with resistance. Despite their successful personal life, they still face challenges with their siblings. The main speaker questions why they continue to engage in destructive conversations with their sister and why they feel heightened anxiety afterwards. They conclude by comparing the fear of enforcing boundaries to the fear of public speaking, as both are associated with potential threats to survival.

Moving on to the concept of sacrifice, the main speaker believes that sacrifice is giving up something you value for something you value less. They argue that even actions that seem altruistic can be seen as choices that increase one's own values. They believe that humans should not be sacrificial animals and that prioritizing immediate desires over long-term happiness is selfishness.

The main speaker explains the concept of the hedonic treadmill, where pleasure from investments like hedonism decreases over time, while pleasure from investments like having children increases. They argue that putting happiness solely on things like sex or travel is a losing game, as the initial excitement will fade and lead to a diminishing situation. They also discuss the pursuit of money at the expense of love and relationships, emphasizing that wealth and success alone do not guarantee happiness.

The main speaker addresses the importance of creating good definitions of concepts and explains that concepts arise because atoms exist. They use the example of water to illustrate how consistent behavior of atoms allows us to create accurate concepts. When it comes to moral concepts, the main speaker believes in simplicity and universalizing rules. They argue that moral concepts don't have to be complicated and that Christianity understood this simplicity long before philosophers did.

In conclusion, the main speaker emphasizes the importance of not engaging with immoral individuals and the need for people in one's life who respect the rules of conflict. They advise against trying to understand the actions of "crazy people" and caution against prioritizing instant gratification over long-term happiness. The main speaker also discusses the challenges of enforcing boundaries and the simplicity of creating good definitions for concepts. They conclude by expressing their gratitude and encouraging listeners to check out their premium content.