If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
"In the last couple of weeks, you have repeatedly reiterated your stance that you don't believe in a soul or any other sort of divine essence that could be "dug out" or set free and give people the ability to change. Yet empirical evidence shows that you spend an enormous amount of time talking to people attempting to do just that — showing them the parts of themselves that have been hurt and giving them the tools to protect and nurture those parts in order to heal and improve their lives. You have also repeatedly used phrases such as "selling your soul to the devil", "soul murder", etc.
"Isn't that evidence that you actually DO believe in a soul (even if perhaps it is not immortal and can be damaged beyond repair or somehow sold for material profit) or some similar construct? Because otherwise, it would seem to imply that all of your work is merely entertainment..."
"Hi Stefan, thanks for the forum and time you give to the community, you’ve helped tremendously over the years. I’ll do my best to support more of your good works when I’m financially better able. Onwards, my question is what constitutes a genuine or acceptable apology from a parent to a child regarding verbal and physical abuse sustained during the childhood? for example hypothetically would a simple “I’m sorry” cover it? if genuine or would you see it necessary for a more detailed and context based apology? If this has been asked and answered before, feel free to skip if so, and thanks again!"
"Hi Stef, I’ve been thinking recently about the idea of living a life guided by rational and moral principles at which point the question emerges. What does it mean to be rational? I think you have done some great work on elaborating on what it means to be moral, but I still find myself unsure about rationality (perhaps due to my lack of research).
"As such here is my question. Is it rational for parents to hit their children? If rationality is seen as behaving in such a way that you make a perceived outcome more likely, are parents acting rationally in this case? If what they want is their children’s obedience, or to socialise their children to be able to fit into the world as it is, is it irrational for them to hit their children?"
Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!
NOW AVAILABLE FOR SUBSCRIBERS: MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING' - AND THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI AND AUDIOBOOK!
Also get the Truth About the French Revolution, the interactive multi-lingual philosophy AI trained on thousands of hours of my material, private livestreams, premium call in shows, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more!
See you soon!
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Stefan Molyneux kicks off with some wry observations about handling winter roads in Canada, then shifts to picking apart today's dating scene and the roles men and women play in it. He stresses that relationships work best when both sides bring something worthwhile to the table, and he fields calls from listeners dealing with issues around raising kids and navigating romance. Toward the end, Molyneux urges people to pay more attention to how they talk to each other and to build real bonds as the new year rolls in, offering a nod to what might lie ahead.
0:00:00 New Year's Reflections
0:01:46 The Nature of Love
0:07:02 Modern Dating Dilemmas
0:12:14 The Demands We Make
0:16:25 Reciprocity in Relationships
0:22:43 The Illusion of Worth
0:27:03 New Year's Resolutions
0:33:03 Parenting and Relationships
0:38:05 Navigating Peer Pressure
0:45:15 The Complexity of Integrity
0:54:18 Trustworthiness in Marriage
0:58:02 The Meaning of Commitment
1:06:23 Legacy and Reputation
1:13:03 Virtue and ...
Stefan Molyneux discusses a caller's book, "Signature of the Trinity," which examines God's existence through the Christian Trinity. They consider the constraints of traditional arguments, the notion of the twofold nature of divine truth, and the strains between divine sovereignty and free will. Molyneux probes the caller's stance on logical inconsistencies and emphasizes rational morality. The exchange wraps up as the caller describes his work and suggests further conversations.
https://www.overcomemortgages.co.uk/
0:00:00 Introduction to God's Design
0:00:09 The Journey to Writing the Book
0:01:45 The Unique Argument for the Christian God
0:04:26 Understanding Twofoldness in Divine Truth
0:06:58 The Contradiction of Free Will and Sovereignty
0:09:24 The Challenge of Grasping Divine Nature
0:14:12 Teaching Children About Morality
0:19:41 The Nature of Logic in Children
0:23:23 Explaining Morality Without Understanding God
0:25:49 Criteria for Twofoldness
0:28:48 Scientific Examples of Twofoldness
...
Was chatting up a woman and texted her that I’m interested in dating. She’s a bit further away but asked that if we were closer if she’d date me. Her response:
“If we got along (vibed), and had good chemistry then definitely”
Thoughts? Red flag?
Hi there!
As an anarcho-capitalist, I had a discussion with my in-laws over Christmas about “taxation is theft” and a “stateless society” that completely got out of hand. Although my wife and I are now in a fight with some of my in-laws because of their over-the-top reaction and how they derailed the debate by yelling and then going home, my father-in-law was reasonable and wanted to know more about my ideas and where they came from. We are going to talk about it again soon. My question to you is: in which podcasts by Stefan Molyneux does he explain how a stateless society would function? I know he has talked about Dispute Resolution Organisations, but I don’t know exactly which ones. And although I’ve been searching a lot on fdrpodcasts.com, I haven’t found the right podcasts yet. Can you give my search process a boost?
Thanks a lot!
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.