If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Wednesday Night Live 25 June 2025
In this episode, I examine the complexities of forgiveness, discussing whether it must be earned and the moral implications of accountability. I explore the tension between those seeking resolution without confrontation and those calling for responsibility, while also addressing how corporate decisions often ignore customer feedback due to ideological agendas.
I emphasize personal responsibility, the importance of acknowledging wrongs for growth, and the impact of family dynamics on self-worth. Vulnerability’s role in strengthening relationships is highlighted, along with the challenges of aligning our values with our aspirations.
The episode concludes with insights into how past relationship experiences shape current dating challenges, urging reflection on what we seek in partners and how past traumas influence our pursuits. This conversation invites self-reflection and integrity in our interactions.
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE ...
Tuesday Afternoon Twitter Space 24 June 2025
This lecture examines the complexities of forgiveness, arguing that it should be earned rather than given freely. Stefan Molyneux discusses the risks of unearned forgiveness, illustrating how it can lead to a lack of accountability and perpetuate harmful behaviors. He critiques societal pressures to forgive for personal peace and highlights the importance of genuine restitution, which involves acknowledgment of wrongdoing and corrective actions. The lecture further explores the implications of forgiveness in relationships, the nature of apologies, and the need for moral responsibility across generations. Through audience interactions, Molyneux emphasizes the importance of navigating forgiveness with ethical integrity and mutual respect, ultimately urging listeners to reconsider their understanding of forgiveness as a process grounded in moral accountability rather than emotional obligation.
GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE ...
Come join me on X/Twitter Spaces tonight! Love chatting with you all, bring your toughest questions!
Stay tuned for the link!
Subscribers get early previews for shows!
Follow me on X! https://x.com/stefanmolyneux
In this lecture, Stefan Molyneux examines the theme of indifference among Christians during his childhood experiences of violence and trauma. He highlights the contradictions between Christian moral teachings and the inaction of those professing these values, reflecting on a pervasive neglect he encountered from supportive figures. Molyneux discusses the challenge of evil as a critical issue for humanity, arguing that both religious frameworks and atheistic nihilism fall short in addressing this problem. He introduces his ethical system of Universally Preferable Behavior (UPB), which aims to provide an objective moral foundation independent of religious beliefs or governmental authority. Central to his discussion is the protection of children, with Molyneux critiquing existing moral and educational systems for failing to ensure their safety. He concludes by urging exploration of concepts like peaceful parenting and...
Kant VS UPB
Kant is nearly incomprehensible, but my understanding of the rationale for his Categorical Imperative is:
If there exists an "ought" that applies to all persons and actions in all places at all times, then this universal "ought" (categorical imperative) must be universalizable, by definition. Therefore all actions must conform to the principle of universalizability.
Thus his first formulation of the CI: "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
How is this not UPB?
Stefbot did not help, so I watched the Big, Chatty Forehead himself: https://freedomain.locals.com/upost/2634493/an-introduction-to-ontological-morality-kant-vs-upb to find out, but found no adequate explanation.
Stef's arguments are:
1 - Kant is a hypocrite for exempting the state from the CI.
But, by Stef's admission, this is not an argument.
2 - Kant doesn't answer the question "why be good?".
But he does. The answer is because you are a rational agent. To ...
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.