If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.
(First off this might come off as bit of contradictory post but, stay me and comment if you’d like)
I woke up this morning thinking some stuff about people and my general outlook on a lot of stuff (likely prompted by listening to the first 3 hours of Malcolm Gladwells “Outliers” before bed. A bit deterministic though.) and thought posting this here would be the best of places.
Any way I had dream about serendipitously meeting a minor celebrity from most comedy based video game show podcast (The bleeding heart of said group) co-star now current host though less popular (even I rarely listen nowadays). We were after like a meeting or something in the traditionally professional sphere. Afterwards I made same chitchat with the a woman (a professional ethnic looking woman (Spanish/South East Asian/Italian/Greek adajecent) next to me who start to talk vapiditly and incessantly. Until tried to get in a word edge wise about the podcaster sitting next to her. Who seemed to over hear and looked a bit shy/humble about it. I was happy/shy as well meeting someone else you only hear in the flesh. But, the woman seemed hostile/disintested about the whole situation. Like the wind in her sails just stopped and seemed to immediately want to bail but, thought it would be rude.
After that I woke up before deciding to post this I began to think about how a lot of the times people just underservely want or demand your attention but, will not make any iota of effort to respricate. Or at least ask for questions around the subject of interest. To you know like be let in on the conversation in some way instead of just seething like a dog with a stolen bone. All in all thinking about this I definitely think this line of thought was sparked by the chapter of the aforementioned book about the problem of genius. Which more about the Mattew Principle (he has stuff will get more stuff and he who has little will have it taken) and effectively communicating for yourself, your needs, and for others that are usually shaped by how we were raised may help or hinder you despite whatever inherent abilities you have.
All this to say that a lot if time in the world today there just seem to a over abundance of selfishness. And it’s usually about things that don’t actually matter empty conversation, empty politics, empty care, empty calories. Only the need of the hungry ghost.
Like a lot of time in my life I got out a majority problems or made connections by simply paying attention and asking simple questions. But, it seems to be a bridge to far for some to actually observe the world they in.
If you read all this like mentioned above feel free to comment and thanks.
All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
This clip comes from "MY MOTHER MADE ME FAT!! Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6147
Understanding true forgiveness is key ✝️ It requires repentance. Let's not fall for the lie that forgiveness can be granted without repentance. The post being read: https://x.com/MarkWDouglas/status/1970348389339382256
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
This clip comes from "MY MOTHER MADE ME FAT!! Twitter/X Space", get the full show at https://fdrpodcasts.com/6147
We need to teach children reason and negotiation, not violence. Our future depends on it! 💡🔫
Watch and share more shorts at https://fdrurl.com/tiktok
In "The Art of the Argument," philosopher and host of Freedomain Stefan Molyneux delivers a no-nonsense guide to mastering persuasive talk. Beyond winning debates, it's about sharp logic, emotional smarts, and ethical persuasion to elevate your communication game.
Molyneux breaks down building airtight arguments, exposing fallacies, and handling heated exchanges with wit and depth. Key insights include:
Argument basics: What works, what flops.
Socratic method: Questions that uncover truth.
Emotions in play: Harness them without losing ground.
Ethics: When to fight, when to fold—with integrity.
For debaters or anyone sharpening their voice, this book arms you with tools for real, transformative conversations. Rethink how you argue and persuade.
SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux
The concept of Universal Consequentialism 😱
A year ago, I presented a different view of consequentialism in this community, which is to devide the concept into rational and irrational consequentialism.
Here's a different approach to explain what consequentialism actually is, based on an example Stefan is providing in his book "Peaceful Parenting", chapter 11, page 153, timestamp 38:19 in the audio book. Quote:
"Since you are all very clever readers, you will be replying to me in your mind something along the lines of this: 'Ah, you say, Mr. Philosopher, that no one can accurately predict the future, but you also state that hitting children has negative outcomes!'
That is certainly true – both that I make that claim, and that hitting children does have generally negative outcomes.
However, we do not judge the morality of hitting children based upon positive or negative outcomes.
For instance, we know that state control of the economy leads to massive inefficiencies – but we don't judge the morality of state control of ...
We're having a subscribers-only chat on THE SOPRANOS tonight!
Subscribers can join at:
X: https://x.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1978992686112649399
Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/posts/2132186
Freedomain: https://freedomain.com/donors-only-sopranos-roundtable-930pm-edt-fifteen-minutes-from-now/
Not yet a subscriber? Follow one of the above links to subscribe and join!
If you are not already a supporter checkout everything you are missing out on in the Preview Article.