All donors get the Peaceful Parenting book / audiobook / AI access to share with any and all parents you know who need help!

THANK YOU SO MUCH!

https://www.freedomain.com/donate

In this episode, Stefan Molyneux looks at the dynamics of dating and social interactions between men and women in public places. He examines the debates about how men approach women, pulling from his own time in the dating world. Through stories from different settings, he covers the fears and obstacles men deal with in pursuing romance. Molyneux talks about attraction, social pressures, and how dating has changed, while also noting the difficulties women face in handling their interests amid expectations. He prompts listeners to think about the difference between our evolutionary background and modern dating habits, stressing the need for real connection in building attraction. In the end, he hopes to get people talking about how these patterns affect society.

SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux

Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1

GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
...

In this Friday Night Live on 12 December 2025, Stefan Molyneux explores philosophical dilemmas with callers, discussing determinism, Kant's ethics, and moral duty. The conversation shifts to the global "metacrisis" and personal sacrifice, before addressing parenting philosophies and the impact of modern values on relationships. Stefan emphasizes the importance of respectful communication and understanding in fostering strong connections, all wrapped in a lighthearted reflection on consumerism and dating.

SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! https://x.com/StefanMolyneux

Follow me on Youtube! https://www.youtube.com/@freedomain1

GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK!
https://peacefulparenting.com/

Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free!

Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for ...

How does this X Spaces show sound?

I'm trying a different style of writing, let me know what you think!

I had to merge two files, can you tell me if there is any significant overlap?

Thanks!

I just listened to UPB verses Evil. I’m confused. If UPB requires the use of the NAP- why is there a need for UPB? The non-aggression principle already proves that rape, theft, assault, and murder are wrong. What am I missing?
I’ve heard Stef explain this multiple times. You can’t want to rape and be raped at the same time (at all times and in all places). But why does that even matter? If the initiation of the use of force is immoral- then rape, theft, murder and assault are immoral.
If UPB does not use the NAP (or the golden rule) as a first principle- then I think the real work would be in explaining how Universal= moral or ethical. Stef spends a lot of time explaining how it is impossible for rape, theft, murder or assault to be universalized. That’s true. But why does universal=moral? Did Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation make gravity moral? I don’t understand.